Literature DB >> 16448235

Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class II division 1 and class II division 2.

Tancan Uysal1, Badel Memili, Serdar Usumez, Zafer Sari.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the transverse dimensions of the dental arches and alveolar arches in the canine, premolar, and molar regions of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusion groups with normal occlusion subjects. This study was performed using measurements on dental casts of 150 normal occlusion (mean age: 21.6 +/- 2.6 years), 106 Class II division 1 (mean age: 17.2 +/- 2.4 years), and 108 Class II division 2 (mean age: 18.5 +/- 2.9 years) malocclusion subjects. Independent-samples t-test was applied for comparisons of the groups. These findings indicate that the maxillary interpremolar width, maxillary canine, premolar and molar alveolar widths, and mandibular premolar and molar alveolar widths were significantly narrower in subjects with Class II division 1 malocclusion than in the normal occlusion sample. The maxillary interpremolar width, canine and premolar alveolar widths, and all mandibular alveolar widths were significantly narrower in the Class II division 2 group than in the normal occlusion sample. The mandibular intercanine and interpremolar widths were narrower and the maxillary intermolar width measurement was larger in the Class II division 2 subjects when compared with the Class II division 1 subjects. Maxillary molar teeth in subjects with Class II division 1 malocclusions tend to incline to the buccal to compensate the insufficient alveolar base. For that reason, rapid maxillary expansion rather than slow expansion may be considered before or during the treatment of Class II division 1 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16448235     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[941:DAAAWI]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  12 in total

1.  Three-dimensional assessment of craniofacial asymmetry in children with transverse maxillary deficiency after rapid maxillary expansion: A prospective study.

Authors:  Karine Evangelista; Carolina Ferrari-Piloni; Leandro Almeida Nascimento Barros; Melissa Ameloti Gomes Avelino; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; José Valladares-Neto; Maria Alves Garcia Silva
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III.

Authors:  Martina Slaj; Stjepan Spalj; Dubravko Pavlin; Davor Illes; Mladen Slaj
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of commercially available arch wires with normal dental arch in a group of Iranian population.

Authors:  Zohreh Hedayati; Farnaz Fakhri; Vahid Moshkel Gosha
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-06

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of dental arch forms in Italian population.

Authors:  Bruno Oliva; Simone Sferra; Anna Lucia Greco; Francesco Valente; Cristina Grippaudo
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  Nonsurgical maxillary expansion in a 60-year-old patient with gingival recession and crowding.

Authors:  Harim Kim; Sun-Hyung Park; Jae Hyun Park; Kee-Joon Lee
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Unexpected malocclusion in a 13,000-Year-old Late Pleistocene young woman from Mexico.

Authors:  José Rubén Herrera-Atoche; James C Chatters; Andrea Cucina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion.

Authors:  Rui Shu; Xianglong Han; Yating Wang; Hui Xu; Dongqing Ai; Lufei Wang; Yeke Wu; Ding Bai
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Evaluation of arch width among Class I normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion in Indian population.

Authors:  Dolly Patel; Falguni Mehta; Nimesh Patel; Nishit Mehta; Ipist Trivedi; Apexa Mehta
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015-09

9.  Archform comparisons between skeletal class II and III malocclusions.

Authors:  Wei Zou; JiaQi Wu; JiuHui Jiang; TianMin Xu; CuiYing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Correlation between dental arch width and sagittal dento-skeletal morphology in untreated adults.

Authors:  Atefe Saffar Shahroudi; Tahura Etezadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.