Literature DB >> 16447196

Long-term biological consequences of donor right hepatectomy including the middle hepatic vein in adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation.

See Ching Chan1, Chung Mau Lo, Yik Wong, Chi Leung Liu, Sheung Tat Fan.   

Abstract

The right lobe liver graft has become the workhorse of adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation. Donor right hepatectomy is feasible only because of the immense regenerative ability of the liver. The long-term biological consequences of this very major donor procedure on the donor however are unknown. Twenty-nine donors of this procedure in our centre, all of whom included the middle hepatic vein, were studied. On long-term follow-up at a median of 47.4 months, there was a discernible but statistically insignificant decrease in size of the regenerated left lobe compared to the original whole liver volume. There was paradoxically a trend of incompleteness of regeneration in relation to the original liver volume for those with a larger remnant left lobe. The volume ratio of the regenerated left lobe to the original left lobe before hepatectomy was inversely proportional to the left lobe proportion preoperatively. This strong but inverse linear correlation reflected the good regenerative ability of the remnant left lobe. None of the donors developed thrombocytopenia. Although demonstrable decrease in white cell count, increase in serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and creatinine did occur, the changes remained within normal limits and were of yet uncertain clinical significance. In conclusion, donor right hepatectomy including the middle hepatic vein is biologically acceptable to the live donor. Copyright 2006 AASLD

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16447196     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  6 in total

1.  Kinetics of liver regeneration in donors after living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective analysis of "2/3rd partial hepatectomy" model at 3 months.

Authors:  Shailesh Anand Sable; Sharad Maheshwari; Swapnil Sharma; Kapildev Yadav; Ashutosh Chauhan; Sorabh Kapoor; Vibha Varma; Vinay Kumaran
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-29

2.  Convergence process of volumetric liver regeneration after living-donor hepatectomy.

Authors:  Taku Aoki; Hiroshi Imamura; Yutaka Matsuyama; Yoji Kishi; Takashi Kobayashi; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Donor safety in live-related liver transplantation.

Authors:  V A Wakade; S K Mathur
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Historical perspective of living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; Sheung Tat Fan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Segment 4 and the left lateral segment regeneration pattern after resection of the middle hepatic vein in a living donor right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Nir Lubezky; Irina Oyfe; Alan G Contreras; Juan P Rocca; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Tara Keegan; Bashir Taouli; Leona Kim-Schluger; Sander Florman; Thomas Schiano; Marcelo Facciuto
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Post-Operative Complications in Living Liver Donors: A Single-Center Experience in China.

Authors:  Zhongquan Sun; Zhiyong Yu; Songfeng Yu; Jihao Chen; Jingqiao Wang; Cheng Yang; Mengmeng Jin; Sheng Yan; Mangli Zhang; Min Zhang; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.