| Literature DB >> 16446935 |
David Greco Varela1, Marcos Grellet.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Many techniques were applied to treat patients with sulcus vocalis and scarred vocal folds. Their results were not good enough. In the Technique of Vocal Fold Pediculated Mucosa Flap, an anterior pediculated flap of vocal fold is positioned on the superficial layer of the lamina propria, below the free margin. AIM: To describe histological postoperative findings on the superficial layer of lamina propria during the application of the technique Vocal Fold Pediculated Mucosa Flap. The following parameters were compared between tested and control groups: total, type I and type III collagen and number of cellular nucleus. STUDYEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16446935 PMCID: PMC9450528 DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)31329-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1808-8686
Figure 1Incision made on the upper surface of the vocal fold and subepithelial detachment.
Figure 2Incision on the upper surface of the vocal fold, 2 millimeters laterally to the first incision and detachment under the region delimited by two incisions.
Figure 3Performance of pediculated graft, positioning on subepithelial region and fixation with fibrin glue.
Graph 1Variation of mean area of total, Type I and Type III collagen in postoperative period (n=3 for each period of observation).
Total, type III and type I collagen and number of cell nuclei. Calculation of the mean of each postoperative period.
| Total | Collagen (μ2) Type III | Type I | Cell Nuclei | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOG 1 | 3907,85 | 83,44 | 3824,41 | 44 | |
| 10 | DOG 2 | 688,58 | 93,4 | 595,18 | 79 |
| DPO | DOG 3 | 1330,73 | 718,78 | 611,95 | 51 |
| MD 10 DAYS | 1975,72 | 298,53 | 1677,18 | 58 | |
| DOG 4 | 1741,01 | 58,05 | 1682,96 | 53 | |
| 30 | DOG 5 | 1348,96 | 478,29 | 870,67 | 24 |
| DPO | DOG 6 | 2396,14 | 591,93 | 1804,21 | 36 |
| MD 30 DAYS | 1828,7 | 376,09 | 1452,61 | 38 | |
| DOG 7 | 1715,62 | 602,34 | 1113,29 | 64 | |
| 90 | DOG 8 | 1027,49 | 82,77 | 944,72 | 21 |
| DPO | DOG 9 | 3794,55 | 294,4 | 3500,15 | 29 |
| MD 90 DAYS | 2179,22 | 326,5 | 1852,72 | 38 | |
| DOG 10 | 4097,22 | 138,92 | 3958,3 | 29 | |
| 180 | DOG 11 | 3303,84 | 136,69 | 3167,16 | 47 |
| DPO | DOG | 2590,43 | 335,9 | 2254,54 | 27 |
| MD 180 DAYS | 3330,49 | 203,83 | 3126,66 | 34 | |
| DOG 13 | 1080,18 | 261,63 | 818,55 | 21 | |
| 360 | DOG 14 | 1214,96 | 124,94 | 1090,02 | 39 |
| DPO | DOG 15 | 1479,39 | 696,52 | 782,87 | 62 |
| MD 360 DAYS | 1258,17 | 361,02 | 897,15 | 41 |
** MD= mean, DPO: postoperative day, μ2= squared micrometer
Area of total, Type III and Type I collagen and number of cell nuclei in the control group. Calculation of mean and median.
| Total | Collagen (m2) Type III | Type I | Cell Nuclei | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOG 1 | 2187,31 | 58,28 | 2129,04 | 15 |
| DOG 2 | 2151,52 | 660,05 | 1491,47 | 27 |
| DOG 3 | 1407,8 | 394,73 | 1013,06 | 20 |
| DOG 4 | 1932,06 | 368,22 | 1563,84 | 8 |
| DOG 5 | 3395,34 | 699,54 | 2695,8 | 18 |
| DOG 6 | 2532,83 | 657,59 | 1875,24 | 52 |
| DOG 7 | 2054,88 | 843,72 | 1211,16 | 13 |
| DOG 8 | 1002,21 | 463,19 | 539,03 | 15 |
| DOG 9 | 1890,67 | 609,38 | 1281,29 | 69 |
| DOG 10 | 2301,4 | 432,88 | 1868,53 | 28 |
| DOG 11 | 2027,92 | 774,03 | 1253,89 | 35 |
| DOG 12 | 2469,86 | 475,94 | 1993,92 | 63 |
| DOG 13 | 828,28 | 363,75 | 464,53 | 43 |
| DOG 14 | 834,32 | 248,09 | 286,24 | 23 |
| DOG 15 | 2922,42 | 1028,39 | 1894,03 | 89 |
| MEAN | 1995,92 | 538,52 | 1437,4 | 34,5 |
| MEDIAN | 2054,87 | 475,94 | 1491,46 | 27 |
MD= mean, μ2= squared micrometer