Literature DB >> 16446193

The relative cost of cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasties.

Piers Yates1, Shelley Serjeant, Graham Rushforth, Robert Middleton.   

Abstract

The use of uncemented femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been slow to develop in the UK because of the lack of encouraging published long-term follow-up data, the continued success of the cemented primary THA, and the perceived excessive relative cost of the uncemented THA. In this article, we argue that the total costs of 3 "proven" uncemented stems are comparable with commonly used cemented femoral components, when all necessary materials are taken into consideration. In addition, we will also discuss other potential benefits and drawbacks for considering the use of uncemented stems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16446193     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  [Hybrid and uncemented hip arthroplasty: Contribution margin in the German lump sum reimbursement system].

Authors:  Tim Hanstein; O Kumpe; W Mittelmeier; R Skripitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Apostolos Dimitroulias; Michael P Bolognesi; Katherine L Hwang; Stuart B Goodman; Randall E Marcus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Survival outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented stems in primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  Michael Wyatt; Gary Hooper; Christopher Frampton; Alastair Rothwell
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

4.  Accelerometer-based, hand-held navigation for improved knee alignment in total knee arthroplasty: An observational study.

Authors:  Arun M Swamy; Archit Goyal; Vijay Kumar Digge; Vikrant Manhas; Deepak Gautam; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-11-10

5.  Can choices between alternative hip prostheses be evidence based? a review of the economic evaluation literature.

Authors:  Charlotte Davies; Paula Lorgelly; Ian Shemilt; Miranda Mugford; Keith Tucker; Alex Macgregor
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2010-10-29

6.  Uncemented fully hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem for intracapsular femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic elderly patients: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Fabrizio Rivera; Francesco Leonardi; Pietro Maniscalco; Marco Caforio; Roberto Capelli; Giampaolo Molinari; Paolo Esopi
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2015-08-28

7.  Role of fast-setting cements in arthroplasty: A comparative analysis of characteristics.

Authors:  Neil Ayron Caraan; Reinhard Windhager; Jason Webb; Nadine Zentgraf; Klaus-Dieter Kuehn
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-12-18

8.  Radical scavenging of poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement by rifampin and clinically relevant properties of the rifampin-loaded cement.

Authors:  G A Funk; E M Menuey; K A Cole; T P Schuman; K V Kilway; T E McIff
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Factors affecting aseptic loosening of 4750 total hip arthroplasties: multivariate survival analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Bordini; Susanna Stea; Manuela De Clerico; Sergio Strazzari; Antonio Sasdelli; Aldo Toni
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Implant Optimisation for Primary Hip Replacement in Patients over 60 Years with Osteoarthritis: A Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Implant Costs Using Data from England and Wales.

Authors:  Simon S Jameson; James Mason; Paul N Baker; Paul J Gregg; David J Deehan; Mike R Reed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.