Literature DB >> 16446187

The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Stephen J Kelly1, Stephen J Incavo, Bruce Beynnon.   

Abstract

Proximal ingrowth of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is desirable because it minimizes proximal stress shielding associated with distal ingrowth stems and maximizes bone stock. This is a retrospective evaluation of initial results of revision THA using a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem nominally designed for primary use. Patients requiring femoral stem revision were included if they had sufficient femoral bone stock to support a proximally fixed prosthesis (n = 33). This represents 53% of the femoral revisions performed during the period of the study. The average follow-up was 5 years (range 48-88 months). The mean Harris hip and Oxford hip scores were 86.5 and 25.2, respectively. Radiographically, 100% of the stems demonstrated bone ingrowth fixation. These results are superior to previous reports of primary cementless stems for revision THA. The use of a cementless nonmodular implant provides a viable option in some patients undergoing revision THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16446187     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Luca Cavagnaro; Matteo Formica; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Primary Stem or Full-Porous-Coated Long Stem for Aseptic Femoral Component Loosening: A Matched-Pair Study.

Authors:  Meng-Huan Tsai; Chun-Chieh Chen; Chih-Hsiang Chang; Yuhan Chang; Pang-Hsin Hsieh; Chih-Chien Hu
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-02-15

4.  Effect of local TGF-beta1 and IGF-1 release on implant fixation: comparison with hydroxyapatite coating: a paired study in dogs.

Authors:  Anders Lamberg; Joan E Bechtold; Jørgen Baas; Kjeld Søballe; Brian Elmengaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Long-term outcomes of cementless femoral stem revision with the Wagner cone prosthesis.

Authors:  Kyung-Soon Park; Sheng-Yu Jin; Jun-Hyuk Lim; Taek-Rim Yoon
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Downsizing in total hip arthroplasty. A short stem as a revision implant.

Authors:  Marcel Coutandin; Yama Afghanyar; Philipp Rehbein; Jens Dargel; Philipp Drees; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.087

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.