Literature DB >> 16446185

Intramedullary total femoral replacement for salvage of the compromised femur associated with hip and knee arthroplasty.

Christopher L Peters1, Joshua M Hickman, Jill Erickson, Adolph V Lombardi, Keith R Berend, Thomas H Mallory.   

Abstract

Severely compromised femora because of prosthetic loosening, osteolysis, or periprosthetic fracture around total hip and knee arthroplasties are increasing. Two approaches that create an intramedullary total femoral (IMTF) replacement are reported. Twenty-three IMTF replacements in 22 patients were performed at 2 institutions. Seven revision total knee arthroplasties with a stemmed component were linked to a well-fixed hip stem with a custom intramedullary sleeve. Sixteen IMTF replacements involved revision of both hip and knee arthroplasties which were connected via an intercalary segment with morse taper junctions. Follow-up averaged 36 months. Complications included 2 dislocations, 2 deep infections, and 2 knee revisions for tibial loosening. Advantages over conventional total femoral replacement or ORIF include less dissection, maintenance of soft tissue attachments, and immediate component stability to allow for early mobilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16446185     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.12.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in total femoral replacement.

Authors:  Deepak Ramanathan; Marcelo Bp Siqueira; Alison K Klika; Carlos A Higuera; Wael K Barsoum; Michael J Joyce
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

2.  Use of modular megaprosthesis in managing chronic end-stage periprosthetic hip and knee infections: Is there an increase in relapse rate?

Authors:  Pablo S Corona; Matias Vicente; Mireia Lalanza; Carles Amat; Luis Carrera
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-24

3.  Coupling device and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures with an ipsilateral total knee and hip replacement.

Authors:  Matthew J Grosso; Joseph Lipman; Mathias P Bostrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-09-25

4.  Interposition sleeve as treatment option for interprosthetic fractures of the femur: a biomechanical in vitro assessment.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Michal A Korecki; Kay Sellenschloh; Florian Fensky; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Length of Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Complications and Reoperations.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Barry; Zachary Thielen; David C Sing; Paul H Yi; Erik N Hansen; Michael Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  How to salvage a salvage endoprosthesis.

Authors:  Anil Haldar; Shanjitha Kantharuban; Aadhar Sharma; Jerome A Davidson; Timothy W R Briggs
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-01-17

7.  Megaprostheses for the revision of infected hip arthroplasties with severe bone loss.

Authors:  Nicola Logoluso; Francesca Alice Pedrini; Carlo Luca Romanò; Antonio Virgilio Pellegrini; Ilaria Morelli; Elena De Vecchi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Treatment of interprosthetic femoral fractures with an interposition prosthesis: a technical note.

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Till Orla Klatte; Daniel Kendoff; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Matthias Gebauer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.