Literature DB >> 16445973

The transition to increased automaticity during finger sequence learning in adult males who stutter.

Sarah Smits-Bandstra1, Luc De Nil, Elizabeth Rochon.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The present study compared the automaticity levels of persons who stutter (PWS) and persons who do not stutter (PNS) on a practiced finger sequencing task under dual task conditions. Automaticity was defined as the amount of attention required for task performance. Twelve PWS and 12 control subjects practiced finger tapping sequences under single and then dual task conditions. Control subjects performed the sequencing task significantly faster and less variably under single versus dual task conditions while PWS' performance was consistently slow and variable (comparable to the dual task performance of control subjects) under both conditions. Control subjects were significantly more accurate on a colour recognition distracter task than PWS under dual task conditions. These results suggested that control subjects transitioned to quick, accurate and increasingly automatic performance on the sequencing task after practice, while PWS did not. Because most stuttering treatment programs for adults include practice and automatization of new motor speech skills, findings of this finger sequencing study and future studies of speech sequence learning may have important implications for how to maximize stuttering treatment effectiveness. EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES: As a result of this activity, the participant will be able to: (1) Define automaticity and explain the importance of dual task paradigms to investigate automaticity; (2) Relate the proposed relationship between motor learning and automaticity as stated by the authors; (3) Summarize the reviewed literature concerning the performance of PWS on dual tasks; and (4) Explain why the ability to transition to automaticity during motor learning may have important clinical implications for stuttering treatment effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16445973     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2005.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluency Disord        ISSN: 0094-730X            Impact factor:   2.538


  16 in total

1.  Relationships among linguistic processing speed, phonological working memory, and attention in children who stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Stacy A Wagovich
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  Evidence of left inferior frontal-premotor structural and functional connectivity deficits in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Barry Horwitz; John Ostuni; Richard Reynolds; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  Abnormal neural response to phonological working memory demands in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Fanlu Jia; Peter T Fox; Wai Ting Siok; Li Hai Tan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Behavioral and neural correlates of speech motor sequence learning in stuttering and neurotypical speakers: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Matthew Masapollo; Jennifer A Segawa; Deryk S Beal; Jason A Tourville; Alfonso Nieto-Castañón; Matthias Heyne; Saul A Frankford; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neurobiol Lang (Camb)       Date:  2021-02

Review 6.  How Stuttering Develops: The Multifactorial Dynamic Pathways Theory.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Oral electromyography activation patterns for speech are similar in preschoolers who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Evidence that a motor timing deficit is a factor in the development of stuttering.

Authors:  Lindsey Olander; Anne Smith; Howard N Zelaznik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

10.  Nonword repetition and nonword reading abilities in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.