Literature DB >> 16445651

Routine computerized tomography scanning, groin ultrasound with or without fine needle aspiration cytology in the surgical management of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

R Land1, J Herod, E Moskovic, M King, S A Sohaib, P Trott, N Nasiri, J H Shepherd, J E Bridges, T E J Ind, P Blake, D P J Barton.   

Abstract

We set out to study whether computerized tomography (CT) scanning of the vulva and the groin and groin ultrasound scanning (USS) alone or with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) (USS/FNAC) influenced or could influence the surgical management of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva (SCCaV). Forty-four patients underwent surgery for primary SCCaV following radiologic imaging by one or more modalities. Patient details included the clinical assessment of the carcinoma, radiologic findings, the operation performed, and whether the decision regarding the type and extent of surgery for the vulval carcinoma and, in particular, for the groin node dissection was or could be influenced by the radiologic findings. The age range was 38-87 years, with a median of 74 years. A total of 75 groin dissections were performed. Twenty-five of the 44 patients (56.8%) did not have groin node metastasis, 14 had unilateral metastasis (31.8%), and 5 (11.4%) had bilateral metastasis. All cases with histologically proven nodal status were analyzed to compare the preoperative imaging status with the histology. The calculated sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for CT were 58%, 75%, 75%, and 58%, for USS alone-87%, 69%, 94%, and 48%, and for USS-guided FNAC-80%, 100%, 93%, and 100%, respectively. There was no patient in whom surgical planning for the vulval carcinoma or the groin nodes was or could be altered by the CT findings. The data do not support the routine use of CT scanning in patients with primary SCCaV, either in assessment of the primary vulval carcinoma or in detecting groin nodal metastases. For the groin nodes, USS/FNAC is superior to CT in assessing disease status. In contrast to CT, USS/FNAC may have a useful clinical role in the management of the groin nodes in vulval carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16445651     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00340.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  9 in total

1.  Management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lorraine Jennings; Chrysalyne D Schmults
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2010-04

2.  Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Vulvar Cancer and its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/059, November 2015.

Authors:  H G Schnürch; S Ackermann; C D Alt; J Barinoff; C Böing; C Dannecker; F Gieseking; A Günthert; P Hantschmann; L C Horn; R Kürzl; P Mallmann; S Marnitz; G Mehlhorn; C C Hack; M C Koch; U Torsten; W Weikel; L Wölber; M Hampl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Nodal staging of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew Fox; Marc Brown; Nicholas Golda; Dori Goldberg; Christopher Miller; Melissa Pugliano-Mauro; Chrysalyne Schmults; Thuzar Shin; Thomas Stasko; Yaohui G Xu; Kishwer Nehal
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 4.  Imaging Features of Uncommon Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Maura Miccò; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman; Hedvig Hricak; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Update of the Management of Cutaneous Squamous-cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Eve Maubec
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 6.  The Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Debora Verri; Francesca Moro; Simona Maria Fragomeni; Drieda Zaçe; Sonia Bove; Federica Pozzati; Benedetta Gui; Giovanni Scambia; Antonia Carla Testa; Giorgia Garganese
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Relevance of computerized tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with vulvar cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Kjeld Andersen; Vibeke Zobbe; Ingrid Regitze Thranov; Karen Damgaard Pedersen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 8.  The Complementary Role of Imaging and Tumor Biomarkerszzm321990in Gynecological Cancers: An Update of the Literature

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Silvia Gigli; Laura Ballesio; Antonio Angeloni; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26

9.  State of the art in vulvar cancer imaging.

Authors:  Maria Ana Serrado; Mariana Horta; Teresa Margarida Cunha
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.