Literature DB >> 16445640

Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study.

J Byrom1, G Douce, P W Jones, H Tucker, J Millinship, K Dhar, C W E Redman.   

Abstract

The reliability and applicability of colposcopically directed cervical punch biopsy was assessed in a sample of 170 paired punch and large loop excision of cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) specimens obtained from previously untreated women who had been selected for treatment on the basis of cytology and/or colposcopic findings and in whom the entire cervical transformation zone was visible. A single punch biopsy was taken immediately before the LLETZ, and all the specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist. Nine (5.3%) punch biopsies were inadequate. In terms of whether or not there was cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), the chance-corrected kappa analysis rated overall agreement as poor (kappa = 0.21, 95% confidence limits 0.02-0.39), whereas in terms of histologic grade, it was fair to moderate (kappa = 0.32, 95% confidence limits 0.23-0.42). Punch biopsy tended to underestimate the disease. The sensitivity and specificity of colposcopically directed punch biopsy for the detection of high-grade CIN was 74% and 91%, respectively, with positive- and negative predictive values of 97% and 48%, respectively. Two microinvasive and two intraepithelial glandular lesions were missed on punch biopsy. Punch biopsy should be avoided when high-grade disease is suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16445640     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00344.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  14 in total

1.  Healing pattern of the cervical stroma following cold coagulation treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A case report.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papoutsis; Joanna Williams; Martyn Underwood; William Parry-Smith
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

3.  Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

4.  Treatment of the patients with abnormal cervical cytology: a "see-and-treat" versus three-step strategy.

Authors:  Hanbyoul Cho; Jae-Hoon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Estimating the accuracy of anal cytology in the presence of an imperfect reference standard.

Authors:  William C Mathews; Edward R Cachay; Joseph Caperna; Amy Sitapati; Bard Cosman; Ian Abramson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Long-term psychosocial impact of alternative management policies in women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  L Sharp; S Cotton; N Gray; M Avis; I Russell; L Walker; N Waugh; D Whynes; C Woolley; A Thornton; L Smart; M Cruickshank; J Little
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the uterine cervix in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Se Ik Kim; Se Jeong Kim; Dong Hoon Suh; Kidong Kim; Jae Hong No; Yong Beom Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  Assessing diagnostic tests: how to correct for the combined effects of interpretation and reference standard.

Authors:  Ahmet Omurtag; Andre A Fenton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Natural history of anal dysplasia in an HIV-infected clinical care cohort: estimates using multi-state Markov modeling.

Authors:  William C Mathews; Wollelaw Agmas; Edward R Cachay; Bard C Cosman; Christopher Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Yuyeon Jung; Ah Ra Lee; Sung-Jong Lee; Yong Seok Lee; Dong Choon Park; Eun Kyung Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.