Literature DB >> 16445598

Pain perception after subcutaneous injections of media containing different buffers.

Torben Laursen1, Birtha Hansen, Sanne Fisker.   

Abstract

Several hormones are administered by daily subcutaneous injections. Pain caused by subcutaneous injection is an unpleasant condition, which can limit patient compliance. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the perception of pain by subcutaneous injection of two different and commercially available solutions for dispensing recombinant human growth hormone. The solutions are characterised by pH, conservation, and buffer. Isotonic saline was used as reference solution. Fifty-four healthy volunteers (mean age (+/-S.E.M.): 35.5+/-1.1 years) were recruited to the double-blind, randomised study. All injections were performed pairwise (right and left thigh) in one day by the same experienced nurse. Perception of pain was evaluated by the volunteers immediately after injection and 2 min. after injection into the thigh of three formulations, which differed with respect to pH and buffers (histidine, citrate and saline, respectively). Significantly more participants (38/54) found than the citrate buffer caused more pain than the histidine buffer immediately after injection (P=0.002). Histidine buffer did not cause more pain than saline (P=0.996). After 2 min., there was no difference between the histidine and the citrate buffer (P=1.00), nor between the histidine buffer and saline (P=1.00). In summary, the solution-containing citrate as buffer caused more pain after subcutaneous injection than the solution with histidine as buffer. Considering patient compliance, it seems advisable to employ histidine-buffered solution rather than citrate-buffered solution for dispensing recombinant human growth hormone by daily subcutaneous injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16445598     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_271.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-7835            Impact factor:   4.080


  21 in total

Review 1.  Formulations for children: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Hannah K Batchelor; John F Marriott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Subcutaneous Injection Site Pain of Formulation Matrices.

Authors:  Galen H Shi; Karthik Pisupati; Jonathan G Parker; Vincent J Corvari; Christopher D Payne; Wen Xu; David S Collins; Michael R De Felippis
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Evaluation of performance, safety, subject acceptance, and compliance of a disposable autoinjector for subcutaneous injections in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Cecile Berteau; Florence Schwarzenbach; Yves Donazzolo; Mathilde Latreille; Julie Berube; Herve Abry; Joël Cotten; Celine Feger; Philippe E Laurent
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Impact of Injection Speed, Volume, and Site on Pain Sensation.

Authors:  Eric Zijlstra; Johannes Jahnke; Annelie Fischer; Christoph Kapitza; Thomas Forst
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-08

5.  Comparison of the tolerability of recombinant human hyaluronidase + normal saline and recombinant human hyaluronidase + lactated ringer's solution administered subcutaneously: A phase IV, double-blind, randomized pilot study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Samuel S Dychter; David Ebel; Tonya R Mead; Richard C Yocum
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2009-12

Review 6.  Injection-site reactions upon Kineret (anakinra) administration: experiences and explanations.

Authors:  Christina Kaiser; Ann Knight; Dan Nordström; Tom Pettersson; Jonas Fransson; Ebba Florin-Robertsson; Björn Pilström
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Randomized Crossover Comparison of Injection Site Pain with 40 mg/0.4 or 0.8 mL Formulations of Adalimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Peter Nash; Johan Vanhoof; Stephen Hall; Udayasankar Arulmani; Rita Tarzynski-Potempa; Kristina Unnebrink; Andrew N Payne; Alfred Cividino
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2016-08-18

8.  User assessment of Norditropin NordiFlex(®), a new prefilled growth hormone pen: a Phase IV multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Maithé Tauber; Delphine Jaquet; Monique Jesuran-Perelroizen; Marc Petrus; Anne Marie Bertrand; Regis Coutant
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Product wastage from modern human growth hormone administration devices: a laboratory and computer simulation analysis.

Authors:  Richard F Pollock; Yujun Qian; Tami Wisniewski; Lisa Seitz; Anne-Marie Kappelgaard
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2013-08-01

10.  Study protocol: A multi-centre, double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel group, phase II trial (RIDD) to determine the efficacy of intra-nodular injection of anti-TNF to control disease progression in early Dupuytren's disease, with an embedded dose response study.

Authors:  Jagdeep Nanchahal; Catherine Ball; Jennifer Swettenham; Susan Dutton; Vicki Barber; Joanna Black; Bethan Copsey; Melina Dritsaki; Peter Taylor; Alastair Gray; Marc Feldmann; Sarah Lamb
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2017-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.