Literature DB >> 16444562

Prognostic analysis of clinicopathologic factors in 49 patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion.

Marcello Deraco1, Daisuke Nonaka, Dario Baratti, Paolo Casali, Juan Rosai, Rami Younan, Andreola Salvatore, Antonello D Cabras Ad, Shigeki Kusamura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a subset of peritoneal mesothelioma with a poor clinical outcome. We performed a prognostic analysis in a cohort of DMPM patients treated homogeneously by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP).
METHODS: Forty-nine DMPM patients who underwent 52 consecutive procedures were enrolled onto the study. Cytoreductive surgery was performed according to the peritonectomy technique, and the IPHP was performed with cisplatin plus doxorubicin or cisplatin plus mitomycin C. We assessed the correlation of the clinicopathologic variables (previous surgical score, age, sex, performance status, previous systemic chemotherapy, carcinomatosis extension, completeness of cytoreduction, IPHP drug schedule, mitotic count [MC], nuclear grade, and biological markers [epidermal growth factor receptor, p16, matrix metalloproteinase 2 and matrix metalloproteinase 9]) with overall and progression-free survival.
RESULTS: The mean age was 52 years (range, 22-74 years). The mean follow-up was 20.3 months (range, 1-89 months). Regarding the biological markers, the rates of immunoreactivity of epidermal growth factor receptor, p16, matrix metalloproteinase 2, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 were 94%, 60%, 100%, and 85%, respectively. The strongest factors influencing overall survival were completeness of cytoreduction and MC, whereas those for progression-free survival were performance status and MC. No biological markers were shown to be of prognostic value.
CONCLUSIONS: Completeness of cytoreduction, performance status, and MC seem to be the best determinants of outcome. These data warrant confirmation by a further prospective formal trial. No biological markers presented a significant correlation with the outcome. The overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor, matrix metalloproteinase 2, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 and absent or reduced expression of p16 might be related to the underlining tumor kinetics of DMPM and warrant further investigation with other methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16444562     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  40 in total

1.  Quality-of-Life Evaluation After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Rebecca M Dodson; Richard P McQuellon; Harveshp D Mogal; Katharine E Duckworth; Gregory B Russell; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Perry Shen; Edward A Levine
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Peritoneal Metastases from Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Authors:  Paul H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes of 401 consecutive cytoreductive procedures with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Authors:  Mariangela Desantis; Jean-Louis Bernard; Vincent Casanova; Marianne Cegarra-Escolano; Emmanuel Benizri; Amine M Rahili; Daniel Benchimol; Jean-Marc Bereder
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy: which drugs?

Authors:  Jacopo Giuliani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03

5.  Assessment of clinical benefit and quality of life in patients undergoing cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for management of peritoneal metastases.

Authors:  Yue Zhu; Nader Hanna; Cherif Boutros; H Richard Alexander
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-03

6.  Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: prognostic factors and oncologic outcome analysis.

Authors:  Deepa Magge; Mazen S Zenati; Frances Austin; Arun Mavanur; Magesh Sathaiah; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Heather Jones; Amer H Zureikat; Matthew Holtzman; Steven Ahrendt; James Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The prognostic significance of BAP1, NF2, and CDKN2A in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Aatur D Singhi; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Haroon A Choudry; David L Bartlett; James F Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; Alyssa Luvison; Kimberly Fuhrer; Nathan Bahary; Raja R Seethala; Sanja Dacic
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 8.  Peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Alessio Bridda; Ilaria Padoan; Roberto Mencarelli; Mauro Frego
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-05-10

9.  Clinical implications of novel activating EGFR mutations in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Jason M Foster; Uppala Radhakrishna; Venkatesh Govindarajan; Joseph H Carreau; Zoran Gatalica; Poonam Sharma; Swapan K Nath; Brian W Loggie
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Treatment factors associated with long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery and regional chemotherapy for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  H Richard Alexander; David L Bartlett; James F Pingpank; Steven K Libutti; Richard Royal; Marybeth S Hughes; Matthew Holtzman; Nader Hanna; Keli Turner; Tatiana Beresneva; Yue Zhu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.