Literature DB >> 16443321

Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: detailed analysis of complications over a 15-year period.

G Pasticier1, M-O Timsit, L Badet, L De La Torre Abril, M Halila, H Fassi Fehri, M Colombel, X Martin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of complications of conservative renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma in both elective and imperative indications, and its evolution over a 15 year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1988 to 2003, 127 patients underwent partial nephrectomy or tumorectomy for renal cell carcinoma in our department. INDICATIONs were imperative in 42% (n = 53) and elective in 58% (n=74) of cases. Morbidity was retrospectively assessed according to four parameters: 1- Period of surgery: A, from 1988 to 1999 and B, from 2000 to 2003. 2- INDICATION: elective vs. imperative. 3- experience of surgeon: senior vs. junior. 4- Nature of complications: minor or major. Comparative analysis was conducted using Chi-square and Fischer exact tests.
RESULTS: Global incidence of complications was 30.7% (n = 39) corresponding to 18.1% minor (n = 23) and 12.6% (n = 16) major complications. Results show a moderate decrease of complication rate during Period B: 28.1% versus 32.9% during period A (p = 0.69). Complications occurred more frequently in imperative indications (49.1%) than in elective indications (17.6%) (p = 0.002), mostly regarding major complications (respectively 28.3% and 1.4%. (p < 0.001)). Overall re-intervention rate was 15.7%: 22.6% in imperative and 10.8% in elective indications (p = 0.008). Mean length of hospital stay was 14.1 days and significantly longer during period A (p = 0.003) and in imperative indications (p = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: In our study, conservative renal surgery has a significant rate of complications which is extremely variable regarding to different parameters. Most discriminating factor was indication: in imperative indications, we observed a high rate of major complications (28.3%) that we consider acceptable to prevent anephria in clearly informed patients. Major complications are exceptional in elective indications. Decreased incidence of complications during the later period (B) is modest, and the role played by systematic pedicular clampage is discussed. As results published in medical literature are difficult to compare, we agree with authors who recently proposed to standardize complications data analysis, using a gravity scale, in order to provide relevant information to patients about statistical risks before surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16443321     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  17 in total

Review 1.  Management of locally recurrent kidney cancer.

Authors:  Eric A Singer; Gennady Bratslavsky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Feasibility and outcomes of partial nephrectomy for resection of at least 20 tumors in a single renal unit.

Authors:  Amaka T Fadahunsi; Thomas Sanford; W Marston Linehan; Peter A Pinto; Gennady Bratslavsky
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Modified laparoscopic simple enucleation with single-layer suture technique versus standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Qun Lu; Xiaozhi Zhao; Changwei Ji; Suhan Guo; Guangxiang Liu; Shiwei Zhang; Xiaogong Li; Weidong Gan; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  [Organ and kidney function preservation in renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  M Schenck; R Eder; H Rübben; C Niedworok; S Tschirdewahn
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for large renal masses: results of a European survey.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Cristian Fiori; Thierry Piechaud; Richard Gaston; Giorgio Guazzoni; Vito Pansadoro; Alexander Bachmann; Gunter Janetschek
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Partial nephrectomy for renal tumors using selective parenchymal clamping.

Authors:  Francisco Rodríguez-Covarrubias; Bernardo Gabilondo; José L Borgen; Fernando Gabilondo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and open partial nephrectomy in patients with a small renal mass.

Authors:  Chang Shik Youn; Jong Mok Park; Ji Yong Lee; Ki Hak Song; Yong Gil Na; Chong Koo Sul; Jae Sung Lim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-09-10

8.  Glue ablation of a late-presentation urinary fistula after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  J J Aning; M A Stott; A F Watkinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Feasibility and outcomes of repeat partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Aaron Johnson; Sunil Sudarshan; Jack Liu; W Marston Linehan; Peter A Pinto; Gennady Bratslavsky
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter comparison study of perioperative results and complications.

Authors:  Andrea Minervini; Gianni Vittori; Alessandro Antonelli; Antonio Celia; Simone Crivellaro; Donato Dente; Vincenzo Di Santo; Bruno Frea; Mauro Gacci; Alberto Gritti; Lorenzo Masieri; Alessandro Morlacco; Angelo Porreca; Bernardo Rocco; Paolo Parma; Claudio Simeone; Stefano Zaramella; Marco Carini; Sergio Serni
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.