Literature DB >> 16443234

Vapor pressure determinations of 8-2 fluorortelomer alcohol and 1-H perfluorooctane by capillary gas chromatography Relative retention time versus headspace methods.

Daryl P Cobranchi1, Miguel Botelho, L William Buxton, Robert C Buck, Mary A Kaiser.   

Abstract

Two distinctly different capillary gas chromatographic methods were used to determine the vapor pressure of 8-2 fluorotelomer alcohol (8-2 FTOH) and 1-H perfluoroheptane at several temperatures. For measurements employing the relative retention-time method, a short polymethylsiloxane column was used from 25 to 65 degrees C. For the 8-2 FTOH, hydrocarbon alcohols and perfluoroalcohols were used as reference standards. For 1-H perfluoroheptane, hydrocarbons were used as reference standards. Vapor pressure estimates could differ by as much as an order of magnitude compared to published results determined by other (nonchromatographic) methods. This variance may be a function of solvent-solute interactions within the gas chromatographic column and the infinite dilution assumption, both used in the relative retention method. For comparison, data were also gathered using headspace gas chromatography (GC) with atomic emission detection (AED). The results from this novel GC/AED method were consistent with prior nonchromatographic results. A discussion of why headspace is the preferred technique for the determination of vapor pressure for fluorinated compounds is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16443234     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  1 in total

1.  Vapor pressure of nine perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) determined using the Knudsen Effusion Method.

Authors:  Mengke Zhang; Kyle Yamada; Stephen Bourguet; Jennifer Guelfo; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  J Chem Eng Data       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.