Literature DB >> 16442976

Comparison of electric stimulation methods for reduction of triceps surae spasticity in spinal cord injury.

Arjan van der Salm1, Peter H Veltink, Maarten J Ijzerman, Karin C Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Anand V Nene, Hermie J Hermens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of 3 methods of electric stimulation to reduce spasticity of the triceps surae in patients with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) and to investigate the carryover effect.
DESIGN: Placebo-controlled study with repeated measurements after the interventions.
SETTING: Research department affiliated with a rehabilitation hospital in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients with a complete SCI were recruited from the outpatient population of the rehabilitation hospital. All subjects had American Spinal Injury Association grade A impairment scores, except for one, who had grade C. The patients had no voluntary triceps surae contractibility.
INTERVENTIONS: Forty-five minutes of cyclic electric stimulation of the agonist, antagonist, or dermatome of the triceps surae or a placebo approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), clonus score, and the H-reflex and M wave (H/M) ratio. The electromyographic response to a stretch of the soleus over the whole range of motion was also determined. The magnitude and ankle angle at which the electromyographic response started were calculated.
RESULTS: Stimulation of the agonist provided a significant reduction in the MAS compared with the placebo approach (P<.001). There was no significant change in the H/M ratio or the electromyographic response amplitude after any of the stimulation methods, whereas stimulation of the antagonist muscle resulted in a significant reduction in the ankle angle at which the electromyographic response started, compared with the placebo approach (P<.037).
CONCLUSIONS: Triceps surae stimulation reduces the MAS for that specific muscle, whereas the angle at which the reflex starts changes after antagonist stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16442976     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  9 in total

1.  Functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury:: from theory to practice.

Authors:  Rebecca Martin; Cristina Sadowsky; Kimberly Obst; Brooke Meyer; John McDonald
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

2.  Comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for spasticity in spinal cord injury - A pilot randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; John M Solomon; Natarajan Manikandan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Clinical assessment of spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Janaina Roland Tancredo; Renata Manzano Maria; Eliza Regina Ferreira Braga Machad de Azevedo; Karina Cristina Alonso; Renato Varoto; Alberto Cliquet Junior
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 4.  Recovery of neuronal and network excitability after spinal cord injury and implications for spasticity.

Authors:  Jessica M D'Amico; Elizabeth G Condliffe; Karen J B Martins; David J Bennett; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-12

5.  Is somatosensory electrical stimulation effective in relieving spasticity? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Antonio Cavalcanti Garcia; Claudia Domingues Vargas
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Reduces Leg Cramps in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disorders: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jan-Frieder Harmsen; Anna Sistig; Alessandro Fasse; Michael Hackl; Kilian Wegmann; Michael Behringer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-11-09

7.  Are Electrically Induced Muscle Cramps Able to Increase the Cramp Threshold Frequency, When Induced Once a Week?

Authors:  Michael Behringer; Tobias Walter Link; Johannes Caspar Konrad Montag; Molly Leigh McCourt; Joachim Mester
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2015-09-28

8.  The effects of exercise with TENS on spasticity, balance, and gait in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Junhyuck Park; Dongkwon Seo; Wonjae Choi; Seungwon Lee
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-10-10

9.  Is the Frequency in Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation the Key Parameter in Modulating the Corticospinal Excitability of Healthy Volunteers and Stroke Patients with Spasticity?

Authors:  Marco Antonio Cavalcanti Garcia; João Marcos Yamasaki Catunda; Marcio Nogueira de Souza; Ana Paula Fontana; Sandro Sperandei; Claudia D Vargas
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.599

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.