BACKGROUND: According to recent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies, expansive remodeling (ER) at the culprit lesion has been observed in almost 50% of patients with acute coronary syndrome and constrictive remodeling (CR) in 30%. The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference between ER and CR at the culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Preinterventional IVUS images of 73 patients with AMI were identified. The remodeling index (RI) was defined as the ratio of the external elastic membrane (EEM) areas at the culprit lesion to the EEM areas at the proximal reference site. Expansive remodeling was defined as an RI > 1.05; CR, as an RI < 0.95. In patients with AMI, 40 patients (55%) showed ER on IVUS, whereas CR was observed in 18 patients (25%). Patients with ER were significantly older than those with CR (P < .005). The frequency of the presence of calcifications was higher in patients with ER than in those with CR (P < .0005). In patients with AMI with ER, soft plaque with small calcium was the most frequent (58%). Multivariate analysis revealed that age and the presence of calcifications remained as independent predictors of ER. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ER relates to old age and calcification, and CR may contribute to early plaque progression than ER in patients with AMI.
BACKGROUND: According to recent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies, expansive remodeling (ER) at the culprit lesion has been observed in almost 50% of patients with acute coronary syndrome and constrictive remodeling (CR) in 30%. The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference between ER and CR at the culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Preinterventional IVUS images of 73 patients with AMI were identified. The remodeling index (RI) was defined as the ratio of the external elastic membrane (EEM) areas at the culprit lesion to the EEM areas at the proximal reference site. Expansive remodeling was defined as an RI > 1.05; CR, as an RI < 0.95. In patients with AMI, 40 patients (55%) showed ER on IVUS, whereas CR was observed in 18 patients (25%). Patients with ER were significantly older than those with CR (P < .005). The frequency of the presence of calcifications was higher in patients with ER than in those with CR (P < .0005). In patients with AMI with ER, soft plaque with small calcium was the most frequent (58%). Multivariate analysis revealed that age and the presence of calcifications remained as independent predictors of ER. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ER relates to old age and calcification, and CR may contribute to early plaque progression than ER in patients with AMI.