Literature DB >> 16442853

Decision support for acute problems: the role of the standardized patient in usability testing.

Jeffrey A Linder1, Alan F Rose, Matvey B Palchuk, Frank Chang, Jeffrey L Schnipper, Joseph C Chan, Blackford Middleton.   

Abstract

For applications that require clinician use while interacting with patients, usability testing with standardized patients has the potential to approximate actual patient care in a controlled setting. We used hypothetical scenarios and a standardized patient to collect quantitative and qualitative results in testing an early prototype of a new application, the Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI) Smart Form. The standardized patient fit well into the usability testing sessions. Clinicians had a positive response to the standardized patients and behaved as they normally would during a clinical encounter. Positive findings of the ARI Smart Form included that users thought it had impressive functionality and the potential to save time. Criticism focused on the visual design, which could be streamlined, and navigation, which was difficult in some areas. Based on these results, we are modifying the ARI Smart Form in preparation for use in actual patient care. Standardized patients should be considered for usability testing, especially if an application is to be used during the patient interview.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16442853     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  8 in total

1.  Helping GPs to extrapolate guideline recommendations to patients for whom there are no explicit recommendations, through the visualization of drug properties. The example of AntibioHelp® in bacterial diseases.

Authors:  Rosy Tsopra; Karima Sedki; Mélanie Courtine; Hector Falcoff; Antoine De Beco; Ronni Madar; Frédéric Mechaï; Jean-Baptiste Lamy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Impact of clinical reminder redesign on physicians' priority decisions.

Authors:  Sze-Jung Wu; Mark R Lehto; Yuehwern Yih; Jason J Saleem; B N Doebbeling
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  A systematic review of mixed methods research on human factors and ergonomics in health care.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Sarah Kianfar; Yaqiong Li; Anping Xie; Bashar Alyousef; Abigail Wooldridge
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Clinical decision support to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Jeffrey Linder; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Lynn A Volk; Ruslana Tsurikova; Matvey Palchuk; Maya Olsha-Yehiav; Andrea J Melnikas; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

5.  "Smart Forms" in an Electronic Medical Record: documentation-based clinical decision support to improve disease management.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Schnipper; Jeffrey A Linder; Matvey B Palchuk; Jonathan S Einbinder; Qi Li; Anatoly Postilnik; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Development of modelling method selection tool for health services management: from problem structuring methods to modelling and simulation methods.

Authors:  Gyuchan T Jun; Zoe Morris; Tillal Eldabi; Paul Harper; Aisha Naseer; Brijesh Patel; John P Clarkson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Roadmap to a more useful and usable electronic health record.

Authors:  John R Windle; Thomas A Windle; Ketemwabi Y Shamavu; Quinn M Nelson; Martina A Clarke; Ann L Fruhling; James E Tcheng
Journal:  Cardiovasc Digit Health J       Date:  2021-10-09

8.  Usability study of a computer-based self-management system for older adults with chronic diseases.

Authors:  Calvin Or; Da Tao
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2012-11-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.