Literature DB >> 16442303

Relating chromatographic retention and electrophoretic mobility to the ion distribution within electrosprayed droplets.

C Fredrik Bökman1, Dan Bylund, Karin E Markides, Per J R Sjöberg.   

Abstract

Ions that are observed in a mass spectrum obtained with electrospray mass spectrometry can be assumed to originate preferentially from ions that have a high distribution to the surface of the charged droplets. In this study, a relation between chromatographic retention and electrophoretic mobility to the ion distribution (derived from measured signal intensities in mass spectra and electrospray current) within electrosprayed droplets for a series of tetraalkylammonium ions, ranging from tetramethyl to tetrapentyl, is presented. Chromatographic retention in a reversed-phase system was taken as a measure of the analyte's surface activity, which was found to have a large influence on the ion distribution within electrosprayed droplets. In addition, different transport mechanisms such as electrophoretic migration and diffusion can influence the surface partitioning coefficient. The viscosity of the solvent system is affected by the methanol content and will influence both diffusion and ion mobility. However, as diffusion and ion mobility are proportional to each other, we have, in this study, chosen to focus on the ion mobility parameter. It was found that the influence of ion mobility relative to surface activity on the droplet surface partitioning of analyte ions decreases with increasing methanol content. This effect is most probably coupled to the decrease in droplet size caused by the decreased surface tension at increasing methanol content. The same observation was made upon increasing the ionic strength of the solvent system, which is also known to give rise to a decreased initial droplet size. The observed effect of ionic strength on the droplet surface partitioning of analyte ions could also be explained by the fact that at higher ionic strength, a larger number of ions are initially closer to the droplet surface and, thus, the contribution of ionic transport from the bulk liquid to the liquid/air surface interface (jet and droplet surface), attributable to migration or diffusion will decrease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16442303     DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  6 in total

1.  Effects of salt concentration on analyte response using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  T L Constantopoulos; G S Jackson; C G Enke
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  A method for determination of ion distribution within electrosprayed droplets.

Authors:  P J Sjöberg; C F Bökman; D Bylund; K E Markides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Predicting electrospray response from chromatographic retention time.

Authors:  N B Cech; J R Krone; C G Enke
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Effect of affinity for droplet surfaces on the fraction of analyte molecules charged during electrospray droplet fission.

Authors:  N B Cech; C G Enke
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  A predictive model for matrix and analyte effects in electrospray ionization of singly-charged ionic analytes.

Authors:  C G Enke
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  A mechanistic study of electrospray mass spectrometry: charge gradients within electrospray droplets and their influence on ion response.

Authors:  S Zhou; K D Cook
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.262

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Evolution of the solvent polarity in an electrospray plume.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Renato Zenobi
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Monte carlo simulation of macromolecular ionization by nanoelectrospray.

Authors:  Christopher J Hogan; Pratim Biswas
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Current literature in mass spectrometry.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.982

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.