Literature DB >> 16442301

Changes in ultraviolet absorbance and hence in protective efficacy against lipid peroxidation of organic sunscreens after UVA irradiation.

Elisabetta Damiani1, Luca Rosati, Riccardo Castagna, Patricia Carloni, Lucedio Greci.   

Abstract

Owing to the spectral distribution of solar UV, the UVA component of sunlight is now believed to be the main cause of photoaging and photocarcinogenesis and is much more effective than UVB in inducing peroxidative damage. Consequently, most skin care cosmetic products now include UVA filters in their formulations along with UVB filters. These modern sunscreens should provide and maintain their initial absorbance, hence protection, throughout the entire period of exposure to sunlight. However, not all UVA and UVB filters are sufficiently photostable. In this study, we examine the correlation between the photochemical degradation of sunscreen agents under UVA irradiation, with particular reference to the UVA-absorber 4-tert-butyl-4'-methoxydibenzoylmethane, alone and in combination with other organic UV filters (2-ethylhexyl 4 methoxycinnamate and 2-ethylhexyl 2-cyano-3,3-diphenylacrylate) and their ability to prevent UVA-induced lipid peroxidation. Since antioxidants are also added to formulations to deactivate free radicals generated during UVA exposure, vitamin E and the synthetic antioxidant, bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-oxyl-piperidine-4-yl)sebacate, a nitroxide derivative, were also included in this study. By using simple in vitro tests, the results show that a decrease in spectral absorbance of the UV filters correlates in most cases with increased UVA-induced lipid peroxidation; this depends on the specific UV absorber analysed and also on whether they are alone or in combination. Furthermore, the combined presence or absence of antioxidants has a profound effect on this oxidative event. In particular, the nitroxide appears to be a more efficient photo-antioxidant than vitamin E. Similar experiments were also performed under natural sunlight and the results obtained did not differ substantially from those performed under UVA. The results presented and discussed in this work may help in understanding the effects of UVA/UVB absorbers and antioxidants upon the level of UV-induced ROS generated under UVA exposure and in natural sunlight which could be relevant for improving the photoprotection and efficacy of skin care cosmetic formulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16442301     DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B        ISSN: 1011-1344            Impact factor:   6.252


  5 in total

1.  Incorporation in lipid microparticles of the UVA filter, butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane combined with the UVB filter, octocrylene: effect on photostability.

Authors:  Santo Scalia; Matteo Mezzena
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Prevention of UVA-induced oxidative damage in human dermal fibroblasts by new UV filters, assessed using a novel in vitro experimental system.

Authors:  Francesca Brugè; Luca Tiano; Paola Astolfi; Monica Emanuelli; Elisabetta Damiani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Estimation of physicochemical properties of 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC) degradation products and their toxicological evaluation.

Authors:  Alicja Gackowska; Waldemar Studziński; Edyta Kudlek; Mariusz Dudziak; Jerzy Gaca
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Fungal melanin as a biocompatible broad-spectrum sunscreen with high antioxidant activity.

Authors:  Jeong-Joo Oh; Jee Young Kim; Seung Han Son; Won-Jo Jung; Da Hee Kim; Jin-Woo Seo; Gyu-Hyeok Kim
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Formation of chlorinated breakdown products during degradation of sunscreen agent, 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate in the presence of sodium hypochlorite.

Authors:  Alicja Gackowska; Maciej Przybyłek; Waldemar Studziński; Jerzy Gaca
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.