Literature DB >> 16442153

A phase III randomized trial of BAY 12-9566 (tanomastat) as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer responsive to primary surgery and paclitaxel/platinum containing chemotherapy: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study.

H Hirte1, I B Vergote, J R Jeffrey, R N Grimshaw, S Coppieters, B Schwartz, D Tu, A Sadura, M Brundage, L Seymour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: BAY 12-9566 (tanomastat) is a biphenyl matrix metalloprotease inhibitor (MMPI) with antiangiogenic and antimetastatic properties in vivo. The objective of the study was to determine whether the addition of BAY 12-9566 after optimal response to chemotherapy could improve time to progression (TTP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in the study had received 6-9 cycles of platinum/paclitaxel containing chemotherapy for stage III or IV ovarian carcinoma, with a response of no evidence of disease, or complete or partial response with residual disease < 2 cm. Patients were then randomized to BAY 12-9566 800 mg p.o. b.i.d. or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were quality of life, toxicity, changes in CA 125 levels, response, and overall survival (OS). The total planned sample size was 730.
RESULTS: The study was closed after 243 patients had been randomized because of Bayer's decision to close all ongoing trials due to negative results from other phase III trials in pancreatic and small cell lung cancer. The final analysis was performed in August 2000 after the requisite number of events for the first planned interim analysis had occurred; 54% of patients had progressed and 18% had died. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: performance status was ECOG 0/1/2 in 65/33/2%; median age 57 years; 79% of patients were FIGO stage III; 41% were optimally debulked; 76% had serous histology, and 67% had > or = grade 3 histology. Toxicity was generally grade 1 or 2 in severity, with the most common (BAY 12-9566 vs. placebo) being nausea (26% vs. 13%), fatigue (24% vs. 12%), diarrhea (14% vs. 10%), rash (12% vs. 7%), grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (3% vs. 1%), and grade 3/4 anemia (5% vs. 1%). Median time to progression (TTP) was 10.4 months (8.5-11.5) for BAY 12-9566 and 9.2 months (7.2-13.9) for placebo (P = 0.67). Median overall survival (OS) was 13.9 months (12.9-infinity) for BAY 12-9566 and 11.9 months (10.5-16.5) for placebo (P = 0.53).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that BAY 12-9566 was generally well tolerated and at the time of the final analysis, there was no evidence of an impact of BAY 12-9566 on PFS or OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16442153     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  40 in total

1.  Continued chemotherapy after complete response to primary therapy among women with advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Nan Rong; Patrick O Monahan; Paridha Gupta; Champ Thomaskutty; Daniela Matei
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: Turning Past Failures Into Future Successes.

Authors:  Arthur Winer; Sylvia Adams; Paolo Mignatti
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 3.  Liver regeneration and tumor stimulation--a review of cytokine and angiogenic factors.

Authors:  Christopher Christophi; Nadia Harun; Theodora Fifis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Extracellular matrix molecules: potential targets in pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Hannu Järveläinen; Annele Sainio; Markku Koulu; Thomas N Wight; Risto Penttinen
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 5.  Emerging enzymatic targets controlling angiogenesis in cancer: preclinical evidence and potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Biagio Ricciuti; Jennifer Foglietta; Rita Chiari; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Maciej Banach; Vanessa Bianconi; Matteo Pirro
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Contemporary quality of life issues affecting gynecologic cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jeanne Carter; Richard Penson; Richard Barakat; Lari Wenzel
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 7.  The Globalization of Cooperative Groups.

Authors:  Manuel Valdivieso; Benjamin W Corn; Janet E Dancey; D Lawrence Wickerham; L Elise Horvath; Edith A Perez; Alison Urton; Walter M Cronin; Erica Field; Evonne Lackey; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 8.  Tumor stroma as targets for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Jinsong Liu
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 12.310

9.  Current status of maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joanie Mayer Hope; Stephanie V Blank
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

10.  A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality of Life Reporting in Ovarian Cancer Phase III Clinical Trials: Room to Improve.

Authors:  Michelle K Wilson; Michael L Friedlander; Florence Joly; Amit M Oza
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.