Literature DB >> 16441750

Relative effects of nocturnal vs diurnal pollinators and distance on gene flow in small Silene alba populations.

Erika L Barthelmess1, Christopher M Richards, David E McCauley.   

Abstract

Silene alba exists in natural metapopulations throughout its range and is visited by a suite of both diurnal and nocturnal pollinators. Pollen-mediated gene flow may help reduce genetic isolation of subpopulations. Here, we compared the relative effects of nocturnal vs diurnal pollinators on pollen-mediated gene flow in subpopulations separated by two distance treatments. We established populations consisting of genetically marked individuals in an old field in Tennessee (USA). Electrophoretic examination of seedlings produced by plants exposed to nocturnal, diurnal and control pollinator treatments and separated by either 20 or 80 m allowed us to directly measure pollen-mediated gene flow. Gene flow was more common between populations separated by only 20 m. Nocturnal pollinators were responsible for most gene flow between populations, regardless of distance. Diurnal pollinators played only a small role in pollen-mediated gene flow. The results suggest that nocturnal pollinators are better than diurnal pollinators at moving pollen between small S. alba subpopulations. However, their effectiveness declines as the distance between subpopulations increases, making them relatively ineffective at moving genes between isolated subpopulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16441750     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  10 in total

1.  Fine-scale spatial genetic structure and gene dispersal in Silene latifolia.

Authors:  M Barluenga; F Austerlitz; J A Elzinga; S Teixeira; J Goudet; G Bernasconi
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Night life on the beach: selfing to avoid pollinator competition between two sympatric Silene species.

Authors:  M Luisa Buide; José Carlos del Valle; Mônica Pissatto; Eduardo Narbona
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Variation in pollen-donor composition among pollinators in an entomophilous tree species, Castanea crenata, revealed by single-pollen genotyping.

Authors:  Yoichi Hasegawa; Yoshihisa Suyama; Kenji Seiwa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How scent and nectar influence floral antagonists and mutualists.

Authors:  Danny Kessler; Mario Kallenbach; Celia Diezel; Eva Rothe; Mark Murdock; Ian T Baldwin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Scale dependence of sex ratio in wild plant populations: implications for social selection.

Authors:  Brian J Sanderson; Malcolm E Augat; Douglas R Taylor; Edmund D Brodie
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The relative contribution of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators to plant female fitness in a specialized nursery pollination system.

Authors:  Giovanni Scopece; Lucia Campese; Karl J Duffy; Salvatore Cozzolino
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.276

7.  Fine-scale spatial genetic structure, mating, and gene dispersal patterns in Parkia biglobosa populations with different levels of habitat fragmentation.

Authors:  Djingdia Lompo; Barbara Vinceti; Heino Konrad; Jérôme Duminil; Thomas Geburek
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  A comparative study on the reproductive success of two rewarding Habenaria species (Orchidaceae) occurring in roadside verge habitats.

Authors:  Wenliu Zhang; Jiangyun Gao
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Cophylogeny of the anther smut fungi and their caryophyllaceous hosts: prevalence of host shifts and importance of delimiting parasite species for inferring cospeciation.

Authors:  Guislaine Refrégier; Mickaël Le Gac; Florian Jabbour; Alex Widmer; Jacqui A Shykoff; Roxana Yockteng; Michael E Hood; Tatiana Giraud
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 10.  Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review.

Authors:  Callum J MacGregor; Michael J O Pocock; Richard Fox; Darren M Evans
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.465

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.