Literature DB >> 16441342

Acute stroke care at rural hospitals in Idaho: challenges in expediting stroke care.

James G Gebhardt1, Thomas E Norris.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Thrombolytics are currently the most effective treatment for stroke. However, the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke criteria for initiation of thrombolytic therapy, most notably the 3-hour time limit from symptom onset, have proven challenging for many rural hospitals to achieve.
PURPOSE: To provide a snapshot of stroke care at rural hospitals in Idaho and to investigate the experiences of these hospitals in expediting stroke care.
METHODS: Using a standard questionnaire, a telephone survey of hospital staff at 21 rural hospitals in Idaho was performed. The survey focused on acute stroke care practices and strategies to expedite stroke care.
FINDINGS: The median number of stroke patients treated per year was 23.3. Patient delays were reported by 77.8% of hospitals, transport delays by 66.7%, in-hospital delays by 61.1%, equipment delays by 22.2%, and ancillary services delays by 61.1%. Approximately 67% of hospitals had implemented a clinical pathway for stroke and 80.0% had provided staff with stroke-specific training. No hospitals surveyed had a designated stroke team, and only 33.3% reported engaging in quality improvement efforts to expedite stroke care. Thrombolytics (tPA) were available and indicated for stroke at 55.6% of the hospitals surveyed.
CONCLUSIONS: Rural hospitals in Idaho face many difficult challenges as they endeavor to meet the 3-hour deadline for thrombolytic therapy, including limited resources and experience in acute stroke care, and many different types of prehospital and in-hospital delays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16441342     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00004.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  5 in total

1.  30-Day risk-standardized mortality and readmission rates after ischemic stroke in critical access hospitals.

Authors:  Judith H Lichtman; Erica C Leifheit-Limson; Sara B Jones; Yun Wang; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Strategies to improve acute stroke care of patients in rural and other geographically dispersed areas.

Authors:  R Charles Callison; Enrique C Leira
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Rationale and design of a statewide telestroke registry: Lone Star Stroke Consortium Telestroke Registry (LeSteR).

Authors:  Cesar Astudillo; Christy Ankrom; Alyssa Trevino; Rene M Malazarte; Arvind B Bambhroliya; Sean Savitz; Christopher H Topel; Truman J Milling; Tzu-Ching Wu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Main barriers to effective implementation of stroke care pathways in France: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kristel Gache; Henri Leleu; Gérard Nitenberg; France Woimant; Marie Ferrua; Etienne Minvielle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Impact of Telemedicine on Access to Acute Stroke Care in the State of Texas.

Authors:  Tzu-Ching Wu; Michael J Lyerly; Karen C Albright; Eric Ward; Amanda Hassler; Jessica Messier; Catherine Wolff; Charles C Brannas; Sean I Savitz; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.511

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.