Literature DB >> 16441192

Symmetry impedes symmetry discrimination.

Bosco S Tjan1, Zili Liu.   

Abstract

Objects in the world, natural and artificial alike, are often bilaterally symmetric. The visual system is likely to take advantage of this regularity to encode shapes for efficient object recognition. The nature of encoding a symmetric shape, and of encoding any departure from it, is therefore an important matter in visual perception. We addressed this issue of shape encoding empirically, noting that a particular encoding scheme necessarily leads to a specific profile of sensitivity in perceptual discriminations. We studied symmetry discrimination using human faces and random dots. Each face stimulus was a frontal view of a three-dimensional (3-D) face model. The 3-D face model was a linearly weighted average (a morph) between the model of an original face and that of the corresponding mirror face. Using this morphing technique to vary the degree of asymmetry, we found that, for faces and analogously generated random-dot patterns alike, symmetry discrimination was worst when the stimuli were nearly symmetric, in apparent opposition to almost all studies in the literature. We analyzed the previous work and reconciled the old and new results using a generic model with a simple nonlinearity. By defining asymmetry as the minimal difference between the left and right halves of an object, we found that the visual system was disproportionately more sensitive to larger departures from symmetry than to smaller ones. We further demonstrated that our empirical and modeling results were consistent with Weber-Fechner's and Stevens's laws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16441192     DOI: 10.1167/5.10.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  4 in total

1.  Symmetry: modeling the effects of masking noise, axial cueing and salience.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The symmetry detection mechanisms are color selective.

Authors:  Chia-Ching Wu; Chien-Chung Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Integration of Color-Selective Mechanisms in Symmetry Detection.

Authors:  Chia-Ching Wu; Chien-Chung Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Testing a formal theory of perception is not easy: Comments on Yu, Todd & Petrov (2021) and Yu, Petrov & Todd (2021).

Authors:  Tadamasa Sawada; Zygmunt Pizlo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.