Literature DB >> 16439741

Outpatient diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: the MIOPED (Manchester Investigation Of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis) study.

K Hogg1, D Dawson, K Mackway-Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pleuritic chest pain, a symptom of pulmonary embolism, is a common presenting symptom in the emergency department. The aim of this study was to validate an algorithm for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients with pleuritic chest pain.
METHODS: This was a prospective, diagnostic cohort study conducted in a large UK city centre emergency department. A total of 425 patients with pleuritic chest pain presenting to the emergency department between February 2002 and June 2003 were recruited. Patients scoring a low modified Wells clinical probability of pulmonary embolism, who had a normal latex agglutination D-dimer, were discharged. All others followed a diagnostic imaging protocol to exclude and diagnose pulmonary embolism using PIOPED interpreted ventilation-perfusion scanning, CT pulmonary angiography, and digital subtraction pulmonary angiography. All patients were followed up for three months for evidence of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. An independent adjudication committee reviewed all deaths.
RESULTS: A total of 408 patients completed the diagnostic algorithm; 86.5% (353/408) were investigated as outpatients, 5.4% (22/408) were diagnosed as having pulmonary embolism, and 98.8% (403/408) were followed up for three months. Of the 381 patients without pulmonary embolism who completed follow up, the incidence of thromboembolic disease was 0.8% (95% CI 0.3% to 2.3%): two patients had pulmonary embolism and one had a deep vein thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The MIOPED (Manchester Investigation Of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis) diagnostic protocol can safely exclude pulmonary embolism in outpatients with pleuritic chest pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16439741      PMCID: PMC2564034          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2005.027110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  20 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of the electrocardiogram in suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  M Rodger; D Makropoulos; M Turek; J Quevillon; F Raymond; P Rasuli; P S Wells
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.

Authors:  P S Wells; D R Anderson; M Rodger; J S Ginsberg; C Kearon; M Gent; A G Turpie; J Bormanis; J Weitz; M Chamberlain; D Bowie; D Barnes; J Hirsh
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  A comparison of spiral computed tomography and latex agglutination D-dimer assay in acute pulmonary embolism using pulmonary arteriography as gold standard.

Authors:  Tage Nilsson; Mårten Söderberg; Gunilla Lundqvist; Kerstin Cederlund; Flemming Larsen; Elsbeth Rasmussen; Bertil Svane; Johan Brohult; Hans Johnsson
Journal:  Scand Cardiovasc J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.589

4.  Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients.

Authors:  S D Qanadli; M E Hajjam; B Mesurolle; O Barré; F Bruckert; T Joseph; F Mignon; A Vieillard-Baron; O Dubourg; P Lacombe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Performance of helical computed tomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  A Perrier; N Howarth; D Didier; P Loubeyre; P F Unger; P de Moerloose; D Slosman; A Junod; H Bounameaux
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer.

Authors:  P S Wells; D R Anderson; M Rodger; I Stiell; J F Dreyer; D Barnes; M Forgie; G Kovacs; J Ward; M J Kovacs
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Chest radiographs in acute pulmonary embolism. Results from the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry.

Authors:  C G Elliott; S Z Goldhaber; L Visani; M DeRosa
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective management study.

Authors:  Marieke J H A Kruip; Marjan J Slob; Joost H E M Schijen; Cees van der Heul; Harry R Büller
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-22

9.  Mortality in patients treated for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  J S Alpert; R Smith; J Carlson; I S Ockene; L Dexter; J E Dalen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  History and physical examination in acute pulmonary embolism in patients without preexisting cardiac or pulmonary disease.

Authors:  P D Stein; P W Willis; D L DeMets
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of strategies for diagnosing pulmonary embolism among emergency department patients presenting with undifferentiated symptoms.

Authors:  Ram S Duriseti; Margaret L Brandeau
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 5.721

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.