Literature DB >> 16439516

Influence of patient thickness and operation modes on occupational and patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology.

E Vano1, L Gonzalez, J M Fernandez, C Prieto, E Guibelalde.   

Abstract

Patient and staff dose values in an interventional cardiology laboratory for different operational modes and several patient thicknesses (from 16 to 28 cm, simulated using polymethylmethacrylate) are presented. When increasing patient thicknesses and depending on fluoroscopy and cine modes, occupational doses can increase >30 times the baseline level. Scatter dose rates at the cardiologist's position with no radiation protective tools ranged from 1 to 14 mSv h(-1) for fluoroscopy, and from 10 to 47 mSv h(-1) during cine acquisition. Patient entrance surface air kerma rates increased by nearly 3 and staff dose rates by up to 2.6 when fluoroscopy was moved from the low to the high mode, for a typical 20 cm thickness. The respective increase factors were 6 and 4.2 when patient thickness rose from 16 to 28 cm, and by 10 and 8.3, when comparing cine acquisition with the low fluoroscopy mode. The knowledge of typical dose rates for each X-ray system in use in catheterisation laboratories is essential in order to optimise protection of patients and staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16439516     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  17 in total

1.  Occupational radiation doses to the extremities and the eyes in interventional radiology and cardiology procedures.

Authors:  E P Efstathopoulos; I Pantos; M Andreou; A Gkatzis; E Carinou; C Koukorava; N L Kelekis; E Brountzos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Personal dosimetry for interventional operators: when and how should monitoring be done?

Authors:  C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiation safety for the speech-language pathologist.

Authors:  Andrea Hayes; Julie M Alspaugh; Detlef Bartelt; Molly B Campion; John Eng; Bob W Gayler; Seanne E Henkel; Bronwyn Jones; Arpana Lingaraj; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Mark Rostkowski; Christine P Smith; Judy Haynos
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U.S. practice.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Deukwoo Kwon; Grant H Bonavia
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Minimizing dose during fluoroscopic tracking through geometric performance feedback.

Authors:  S Siddique; E Fiume; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Iso-uncertainty control in an experimental fluoroscopy system.

Authors:  S Siddique; E Fiume; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Evaluation of basic characteristics of a semiconductor detector for personal radiation dose monitoring.

Authors:  Kento Terasaki; Toshioh Fujibuchi; Hiroo Murazaki; Taku Kuramoto; Yoshiyuki Umezu; Yang Ishigaki; Yoshinori Matsumoto
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-10-28

8.  Can computer-assisted surgery reduce the effective dose for spinal fusion and sacroiliac screw insertion?

Authors:  Michael David Kraus; Gert Krischak; Peter Keppler; Florian T Gebhard; Uwe H W Schuetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [Radiation protection in interventional radiology].

Authors:  R Adamus; R Loose; M Wucherer; M Uder; M Galster
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Staff radiation doses in interventional cardiology: correlation with patient exposure.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Carlos Ubeda; Fernando Leyton; Patricia Miranda; Luciano Gonzalez
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.