BACKGROUND: Cell content of BALF may vary according to the segment of the lung washed. It was proposed to separate BALF into several aliquots, the first sample being more related to bronchi. The present study compared bronchial and alveolar samples by fractionating aliquots of BALF in normal and asthmatic subjects. METHODS: One hundred asthmatic subjects (mean +/- SEM: 37 +/- 1.5 yr in age) were compared with 31 normal subjects (mean +/- SEM: 32 +/- 2.2 yr in age). None of the subjects was a smoker and none was taking drugs that might interfere with the results. The severity of asthma was defined by the clinical score of Aas examining the chronic severity of asthma and ranging from 1 to 5 (range: 1 to 4; mean +/- SEM: 2.2 +/- 0.1) and FEV1 (range: 45 to 130 percent; mean +/- SEM: 82 +/- 1.8 percent of predicted values). Bronchoscopy was done in a standardized manner. A first aliquot of 50 ml of saline each were instilled and the BALF recovered was pooled (alveolar sample). After centrifugation, total and differential cell counts (May Grünwald-Giemsa) were carried out on bronchial and alveolar samples. RESULTS: The alveolar sample contained significantly more cells per milliliter of BALF than the bronchial sample in normal (p less than 0.0077, Wilcoxon test) and in asthmatic subjects (p = 0.0001, Wilcoxon test). Both in normal and asthmatic subjects, bronchial samples contained significantly more neutrophils and epithelial cells and fewer macrophages and lymphocytes than alveolar samples. In asthmatic subjects, the bronchial sample contained a significantly greater percentage of eosinophils than the alveolar sample. Eosinophils were significantly increased in asthmatic subjects for both the bronchial and alveolar samples. Bronchial and alveolar eosinophilia both were correlated with the Aas score (r = 0.25, p = 0.024 and r = 0.38, p = 0.0006, respectively, by Spearman Rank test). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows in a large number of subjects that the cell content of bronchial and more distal segments of the lung is not comparable, indicating that studies should not give pooled data in asthmatic subjects. Moreover, it confirms the presence of BALF eosinophilia in asthmatic subjects.
BACKGROUND: Cell content of BALF may vary according to the segment of the lung washed. It was proposed to separate BALF into several aliquots, the first sample being more related to bronchi. The present study compared bronchial and alveolar samples by fractionating aliquots of BALF in normal and asthmatic subjects. METHODS: One hundred asthmatic subjects (mean +/- SEM: 37 +/- 1.5 yr in age) were compared with 31 normal subjects (mean +/- SEM: 32 +/- 2.2 yr in age). None of the subjects was a smoker and none was taking drugs that might interfere with the results. The severity of asthma was defined by the clinical score of Aas examining the chronic severity of asthma and ranging from 1 to 5 (range: 1 to 4; mean +/- SEM: 2.2 +/- 0.1) and FEV1 (range: 45 to 130 percent; mean +/- SEM: 82 +/- 1.8 percent of predicted values). Bronchoscopy was done in a standardized manner. A first aliquot of 50 ml of saline each were instilled and the BALF recovered was pooled (alveolar sample). After centrifugation, total and differential cell counts (May Grünwald-Giemsa) were carried out on bronchial and alveolar samples. RESULTS: The alveolar sample contained significantly more cells per milliliter of BALF than the bronchial sample in normal (p less than 0.0077, Wilcoxon test) and in asthmatic subjects (p = 0.0001, Wilcoxon test). Both in normal and asthmatic subjects, bronchial samples contained significantly more neutrophils and epithelial cells and fewer macrophages and lymphocytes than alveolar samples. In asthmatic subjects, the bronchial sample contained a significantly greater percentage of eosinophils than the alveolar sample. Eosinophils were significantly increased in asthmatic subjects for both the bronchial and alveolar samples. Bronchial and alveolar eosinophilia both were correlated with the Aas score (r = 0.25, p = 0.024 and r = 0.38, p = 0.0006, respectively, by Spearman Rank test). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows in a large number of subjects that the cell content of bronchial and more distal segments of the lung is not comparable, indicating that studies should not give pooled data in asthmatic subjects. Moreover, it confirms the presence of BALF eosinophilia in asthmatic subjects.