Literature DB >> 1643886

Frequency and prophylaxis of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in critically ill children: a prospective study comparing the efficacy of almagate, ranitidine, and sucralfate. The Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Study Group.

J López-Herce1, P Dorao, P Elola, M A Delgado, F Ruza, R Madero.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the occurrence of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in critically ill children, and the efficacy of prophylaxis with almagate (antacid), ranitidine, and sucralfate.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Pediatric ICU of a tertiary care pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: During a 2-yr study period, 165 patients with one or more upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage risk factors were randomized into one of four groups. Twenty-five patients were excluded because of protocol violations. A total of 140 patients completed the study, with 35 patients in each group.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received no treatment in the control group. The antacid group received almagate 0.25 to 0.5 mL/kg every 2 hrs by nasogastric tube. The ranitidine group received 1.5 mg/kg every 6 hrs iv. The sucralfate group received 0.5 to 1 g every 6 hrs by nasogastric tube.
METHODS: Gastric pH and macroscopic bleeding were determined every 2 hrs in all patients until the end of the study. Macroscopic bleeding was classified as nonhemorrhage, slight, or important. Microscopic gastric bleeding was researched with guaiac testing in 72 patients (680 samples). The severity of illness was evaluated by using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System, Physiologic Stability Index, and the Multiorgan System Failure scores. The risk of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage was evaluated by the Zinner and Tryba indices, and was modified for children.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The occurrence rate of important upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage was higher (by 20%) in the control group than in the rest of the groups (5.7%), p less than .01. There were no differences between the other groups (almagate 5.7%, ranitidine 8.5%, and sucralfate 2.8%). There was a statistically significant correlation between the occurrence rate of important upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, the scores of severity of illness indices (Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System, Physiologic Stability Index, and the Multiorgan System Failure scoring system), the risk of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage indices (Zinner and Tryba), and mortality rate. The Zinner index better classified the patients in relation to the onset of important upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 85.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage is an important complication in critically ill children. Prophylaxis with almagate, ranitidine, or sucralfate reduces the occurrence rate of clinically important gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1643886     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199208000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  13 in total

Review 1.  Histamine H2-receptor antagonists in peptic ulcer disease. Evidence for a prophylactic use.

Authors:  J Nash; L Lambert; M Deakin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Stress ulcer prophylaxis--quo vadis?

Authors:  M Tryba
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Upper GI bleeding among neonates admitted to Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  O M Ombeva; G Ndeezi; J Mugalu
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Prophylactic ranitidine treatment in critically ill children--a population pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  Ahmed F Hawwa; Paul M Westwood; Paul S Collier; Jeffrey S Millership; Shirish Yakkundi; Gillian Thurley; Mike D Shields; Anthony J Nunn; Henry L Halliday; James C McElnay
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Current guidelines on stress ulcer prophylaxis.

Authors:  M Tryba; D Cook
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Pharmacological interventions for prevention and treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in newborn infants.

Authors:  Daniel Stephen Green; Mohamed E Abdel-Latif; Lisa J Jones; Kei Lui; David A Osborn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-02

7.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children in Southern Iran.

Authors:  Seyed Mohsen Dehghani; Mahmood Haghighat; Mohammad Hadi Imanieh; Mahmood Reza Tabebordbar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  The virtual absence of stress-ulceration related bleeding in ICU patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation without any prophylaxis. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  D F Zandstra; C P Stoutenbeek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous omeprazole in critically ill paediatric patients.

Authors:  Maria Jose Solana; Jesús López-Herce
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Need for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Children: A Canadian Survey.

Authors:  Mark Duffett; Karen Choong; Jennifer Foster; Elaine Gilfoyle; Jacques Lacroix; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.