Literature DB >> 1643865

The effects of changing axis II diagnostic criteria.

R Blashfield1, N Blum, B Pfohl.   

Abstract

This study examined whether changes in diagnostic criteria from the DSM-III to the DSM-III for personality disorders (PDs) had the intended effects. Seventy-two subjects at the University of Iowa from three research studies and one clinical sample were administered two structured interviews (the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality [SIDP] and the revised SIDP [SIDP-R]) to assess DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria. Major changes in rates of diagnoses were observed between the DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria with kappas for agreement ranging between -.025 and .571. As expected, the switch from monothetic to polythetic definitions had an effect on which patients were assigned a given diagnosis. However, not all of the other revisions associated with the DSM-III-R had the intended effects. For instance, the frequency of the diagnosis of schizoid PD did not increase, nor did the overlap between borderline and histrionic PDs decrease. In addition, there was an unintended increase in the rate of paranoid PD. An analysis of individual criteria showed how small, apparently minor changes in the wording of criteria can sometimes have major effects on which patients received a diagnosis of PD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1643865     DOI: 10.1016/0010-440x(92)90048-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0010-440X            Impact factor:   3.735


  3 in total

1.  Conceptual changes to the definition of borderline personality disorder proposed for DSM-5.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Joshua D Miller; Thomas A Widiger; Donald R Lynam; Paul A Pilkonis; Samuel A Ball
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-08-29

Review 2.  Multifinality in the development of personality disorders: a Biology x Sex x Environment interaction model of antisocial and borderline traits.

Authors:  Theodore P Beauchaine; Daniel N Klein; Sheila E Crowell; Christina Derbidge; Lisa Gatzke-Kopp
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Prevalence of Borderline Personality Disorder in University Samples: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

Authors:  Rebecca Meaney; Penelope Hasking; Andrea Reupert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.