Literature DB >> 1643826

The E-Test challenged with selected strains.

D F Brown1.   

Abstract

Results with the E-Test minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method correlated well with an agar dilution method in tests using a wide range of selected bacteria. Detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus was as reliable as agar dilution and disk diffusion methods. The ease of use of the E-Test makes it particularly suitable for routine clinical microbiology laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1643826     DOI： 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90091-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN： 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  4 in total

1.  E test versus agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of viridans group streptococci.

Authors:  S J Rosser; M J Alfa; S Hoban; J Kennedy; G K Harding
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of Etest and agar dilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Flavobacterium isolates.

Authors:  P R Hsueh; J C Chang; L J Teng; P C Yang; S W Ho; W C Hsieh; K T Luh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of E test and agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia.

Authors:  J D Yao; M Louie; L Louie; J Goodfellow; A E Simor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of direct inoculation of the BD PHOENIX system from positive BACTEC blood cultures for both Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative rods.

Authors:  Judith Beuving; Christina F M van der Donk; Catharina F M Linssen; Petra F G Wolffs; Annelies Verbon
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.605
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.