Literature DB >> 16437526

Therapeutic communities for substance related disorder.

L A Smith1, S Gates, D Foxcroft.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic communities (TCs) are a popular treatment for the rehabilitation of drug users in the USA and Europe.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of TC versus other treatments for substance dependents, and to investigate whether effectiveness is modified by client or treatment characteristics. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005); MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psycinfo, CINAHL, SIGLE from their inception to March 2004. Reference lists of studies were scanned. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing TC with other treatments, no treatment or another TC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently inspected abstracts, the methodological quality was assessed using Drug and Alcohol CRG checklist. When possible, data were summarised using relative risks and differences in means, otherwise results are presented as reported by authors. MAIN
RESULTS: Seven studies were included. Differences between studies precluded any pooling of data, results are summarised for each trial individually: TC versus community residence: no significant differences for treatment completion; Residential versus day TC: attrition (first two weeks), and abstinence rates at six months significantly lower in the residential treatment group; Standard TC versus enhanced abbreviated TC: number of employed higher in standard TC RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.63, 0.96). Three months versus six months programme within modified TC, and six months versus 12 months programme within standard TC: completion rate higher in the three months programme and retention rate (40 days) significantly greater with the 12 months than 6 months programme. Two trials evaluated TCs within a prison setting: one reported significantly fewer re incarcerated 12 months after release from prison in the TC group compared with no treatment, RR 0.68 (95% CI 057, 0.81). In the other, people treated in prison with TC compared with Mental Health Treatment Programmes showed significantly fewer re incarcerations RR 0.28 (95% CI 0.13, 0.63), criminal activity 0.69 (95% CI 0.52, 0.93) and alcohol and drug offences 0.62 (95% CI 0.43, 0.90) 12 months after release from prison. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence that TCs offer significant benefits in comparison with other residential treatment, or that one type of TC is better than another. Prison TC may be better than prison on it's own or Mental Health Treatment Programmes to prevent re-offending post-release for in-mates. However, methodological limitations of the studies may have introduced bias and firm conclusions cannot be drawn due to limitations of the existing evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16437526     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005338.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  21 in total

1.  Relationship between network clustering in a therapeutic community and reincarceration following discharge.

Authors:  Benjamin W Campbell; Skyler Cranmer; Nathan Doogan; Keith Warren
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-10-24

2.  Factors Predicting Patient's Allocation to Short- and Long-Term Therapeutic Community Treatments in the Italian VOECT Cohort Study.

Authors:  F Vigna-Taglianti; F Mathis; R Diecidue; E Trogu; U Kirchmayer; J Ghibaudi; G Piras; A Camposeragna; A Saponaro; L Amato; M Davoli; F Faggiano; P P Pani
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-02-08

3.  Meta-analyses of seven of the National Institute on Drug Abuse's principles of drug addiction treatment.

Authors:  Frank S Pearson; Michael L Prendergast; Deborah Podus; Peter Vazan; Lisa Greenwell; Zachary Hamilton
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-11-25

4.  How therapeutic communities work: specific factors related to positive outcome.

Authors:  Steve Pearce; Hanna Pickard
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-20

5.  Linguistic analysis to assess the effect of a mindfulness intervention on self-change for adults in substance use recovery.

Authors:  Patricia Liehr; Marianne T Marcus; Deidra Carroll; L Kian Granmayeh; Stanley G Cron; James W Pennebaker
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.716

6.  Comparing the effects of methadone maintenance treatment, therapeutic community, and residential rehabilitation on quality of life and mental health of drug addicts.

Authors:  Ensiyeh Babaie; Nader Razeghi
Journal:  Addict Health       Date:  2013 Winter-Spring

7.  Global patterns of opioid use and dependence: harms to populations, interventions, and future action.

Authors:  Louisa Degenhardt; Jason Grebely; Jack Stone; Matthew Hickman; Peter Vickerman; Brandon D L Marshall; Julie Bruneau; Frederick L Altice; Graeme Henderson; Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar; Sarah Larney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Responding to global stimulant use: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Michael Farrell; Natasha K Martin; Emily Stockings; Annick Bórquez; Javier A Cepeda; Louisa Degenhardt; Robert Ali; Lucy Thi Tran; Jürgen Rehm; Marta Torrens; Steve Shoptaw; Rebecca McKetin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Difference in Response to Feedback and Gender in Three Therapeutic Community Units.

Authors:  Keith Warren; Nathan J Doogan; Fiona Doherty
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.435

10.  Psychosocial Interventions for Amphetamine Type Stimulant Use Disorder: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Mai Thi Ngoc Tran; Quang Hung Luong; Giang Le Minh; Michael P Dunne; Philip Baker
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.