Literature DB >> 16437487

Psychological interventions for multiple sclerosis.

P W Thomas1, S Thomas, C Hillier, K Galvin, R Baker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The unpredictable, variable nature of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and the possibility of increasing disability, means that a diagnosis can have substantial psychological consequences.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of psychological interventions for people with MS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched 19 databases up to December 2004; Cochrane MS Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and 14 others. We searched reference lists of articles, wrote to corresponding authors of the 13 papers identified by June 2004, and searched for trials in progress using 3 research registers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of interventions described as wholly or mostly based on psychological theory and practice, in people with MS. Primary outcome measures were disease specific and general quality of life, psychiatric symptoms, psychological functioning, disability, and cognitive outcomes. Secondary outcome measures were number of relapses, pain, fatigue, health care utilisation, changes in medication, and adherence to other therapies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pertinent studies were identified from abstracts by one author. Full papers were independently compared to selection criteria by four authors. Key details were extracted from relevant papers using a standard format, and studies scored on three dimensions of quality. The review is organised into four mini-reviews (MR) dependent on the intervention's target population; people with cognitive impairments (MR1), people with moderate to severe disability (MR2), people with MS (no other criteria) (MR3), and people with depression (MR4). MAIN
RESULTS: Overall 16 studies were identified and included. MR1: three trials (n=145). Some evidence of effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive outcomes, although this was difficult to interpret because of the large number of outcome measures used. MR2: three trials (n=80). One small trial suggesting psychotherapy may help with depression. MR3: seven studies (n=688). Some evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy may help people adjust to, and cope with, having MS (three trials). The other trials were diverse in nature and some difficult to interpret because of multiple outcome measures. MR4: three trials (n=93). Two small studies of cognitive behavioural therapy showed significant improvements in depression. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The diversity of psychological interventions identified indicates the many ways in which they can potentially help people with MS. No definite conclusions can be made from this review. However there is reasonable evidence that cognitive behavioural approaches are beneficial in the treatment of depression, and in helping people adjust to, and cope with, having MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16437487     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004431.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  54 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation interventions in multiple sclerosis: an overview.

Authors:  Serafin Beer; Fary Khan; Jürg Kesselring
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Neuropsychiatric manifestations of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Laura C Politte; Jeff C Huffman; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008

3.  Rehabilitation interventions for the management of multiple sclerosis relapse: a short scoping review.

Authors:  Miho Asano; Rebecca Raszewski; Marcia Finlayson
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2014

4.  What Does the Cochrane Collaboration Say about Behavioural Change?

Authors: 
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Development and effectiveness of a psychoeducational wellness program for people with multiple sclerosis: description and outcomes.

Authors:  Kimberly Beckwith McGuire; Jelena Stojanovic-Radic; Lauren Strober; Nancy D Chiaravalloti; John DeLuca
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

6.  [Coping training for patients with multiple sclerosis. Evaluation from a neurologic standpoint].

Authors:  S Twork; K H Schwermer; J Kugler
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses.

Authors:  Stefan G Hofmann; Anu Asnaani; Imke J J Vonk; Alice T Sawyer; Angela Fang
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2012-07-31

8.  Variations in functioning and disability in multiple sclerosis. A two-year prospective study.

Authors:  Charlotte Ytterberg; Sverker Johansson; Magnus Andersson; Lotta Widén Holmqvist; Lena von Koch
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Self-perceived physical functioning and health status among fully ambulatory multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Maura Pugliatti; Trond Riise; Monica W Nortvedt; Giovanni Carpentras; M Alessandra Sotgiu; Stefano Sotgiu; Giulio Rosati
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Multi-centre parallel arm randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based cognitive behavioural approach to managing fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Peter W Thomas; Sarah Thomas; Paula Kersten; Rosemary Jones; Alison Nock; Vicky Slingsby; Colin Green; Roger Baker; Kate Galvin; Charles Hillier
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.