Literature DB >> 16437348

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms isolated from infected total hip arthroplasty cases.

Seisuke Nishimura1, Toshiyuki Tsurumoto, Akihiko Yonekura, Koichi Adachi, Hiroyuki Shindo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to treat implant-related infections because bacteria form biofilms on implants. Biofilms protect the organisms from the host's immune system and prevent penetration of antimicrobial agents. We investigated the susceptibility of six strains isolated from infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases to six antimicrobial agents.
METHODS: Six Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis strains isolated from infected THA cases and S. aureus ACTT 25923, positive strains of biofilms, were used in this study. Biofilms were developed on 96-well titer plates. After 7 days the nutrient solution was aspirated, and wells were rinsed three times with sterile water. A series of doubling dilutions of each antimicrobial agent (16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, and 1024 microg/ml) in trypticase soy broth were added to the wells. The plates were incubated at 37 degrees C. After 24 h, the contents were aspirated and wells were rinsed three times with sterile water. The surfaces of wells were vigorously scraped with a sterile swab and applied to sheep blood agar plates at 37 degrees C in an aerobic chamber for 24 h. The minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were determined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic resulting in 100% reduction of viable cells compared to the antibiotic-free control. Biofilms were produced on stainless steel washers, and the time-course changes were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
RESULTS: Planktonic bacteria were sensitive to the antimicrobial agents, but biofilm bacteria were markedly resistant. SEM revealed that biofilms grew larger with time.
CONCLUSIONS: The MBCs of antimicrobial agents for biofilms bacteria were higher than those of planktonic bacteria. Therefore, it is suggested that implant-related infection is difficult to treat with antimicrobial agents alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16437348     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-005-0968-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  32 in total

1.  Murine immune response to a chronic Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection.

Authors:  Ranjani Prabhakara; Janette M Harro; Jeff G Leid; Megan Harris; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Silver ciprofloxacin (CIPAG): a successful combination of chemically modified antibiotic in inorganic-organic hybrid.

Authors:  I Milionis; C N Banti; I Sainis; C P Raptopoulou; V Psycharis; N Kourkoumelis; S K Hadjikakou
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Antibiotic resistance in an in vitro subgingival biofilm model.

Authors:  M J Sedlacek; C Walker
Journal:  Oral Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2007-10

Review 4.  Analysis of bacterial biofilms using NMR-based metabolomics.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Robert Powers
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.808

5.  Suppression of the inflammatory immune response prevents the development of chronic biofilm infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ranjani Prabhakara; Janette M Harro; Jeff G Leid; Achsah D Keegan; Megan L Prior; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 6.  Strategic Moves of "Superbugs" Against Available Chemical Scaffolds: Signaling, Regulation, and Challenges.

Authors:  Bikash Baral; M R Mozafari
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-04-13

7.  A mouse model of post-arthroplasty Staphylococcus aureus joint infection to evaluate in vivo the efficacy of antimicrobial implant coatings.

Authors:  Nicholas M Bernthal; Alexandra I Stavrakis; Fabrizio Billi; John S Cho; Thomas J Kremen; Scott I Simon; Ambrose L Cheung; Gerald A Finerman; Jay R Lieberman; John S Adams; Lloyd S Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  In Vivo Efficacy of a "Smart" Antimicrobial Implant Coating.

Authors:  Alexandra I Stavrakis; Suwei Zhu; Vishal Hegde; Amanda H Loftin; Alyssa G Ashbaugh; Jared A Niska; Lloyd S Miller; Tatiana Segura; Nicholas M Bernthal
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Biofilm Antimicrobial Susceptibility Increases With Antimicrobial Exposure Time.

Authors:  Paulo Castaneda; Alex McLaren; Gamuchirai Tavaziva; Derek Overstreet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Daptomycin in bone and joint infections: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Dennis A K Rice; Luke Mendez-Vigo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.