Literature DB >> 16436851

Ultrasound examination and localization of the sciatic nerve: a volunteer study.

Vincent W S Chan1, Hugo Nova, Sherif Abbas, Colin J L McCartney, Anahi Perlas, Da Quan Xu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the use of ultrasound for sciatic nerve localization. The authors evaluated the usefulness of low-frequency ultrasound in identifying the sciatic nerve at three locations in the lower extremity and in guiding needle advancement to target before nerve stimulation.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 15 volunteers underwent sciatic nerve examination using a curved ultrasound probe in the range of 2-5 MHz and a Philips-ATL 5000 unit (ATL Ultrasound, Bothell, WA) in the gluteal, infragluteal, and proximal thigh regions. Thereafter, an insulated block needle was advanced inline with the ultrasound beam to reach the nerve target, which was further confirmed by electrical stimulation. The quality of sciatic nerve images, ease of needle to nerve contact, threshold stimulating current, and resultant motor response were recorded.
RESULTS: The sciatic nerve was successfully identified in the transverse view as a solitary predominantly hyperechoic structure on ultrasound in all of the three regions examined. The target nerve was visualized easily in 87% and localized within two needle attempts in all patients. Nerve stimulation was successful in 100% after two attempts with a threshold current of 0.42 +/- 0.12 (mean +/- SD) eliciting foot plantarflexion or dorsiflexion.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data show that a curved 2- to 5-MHz ultrasound probe provides good quality sciatic nerve imaging in the gluteal, infragluteal, and proximal thigh locations. Ultrasound-assisted sciatic nerve localization is potentially valuable for clinical sciatic nerve blocks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436851     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200602000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade.

Authors:  Richard Brull; Anahi Perlas; Vincent W S Chan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2007-02

Review 2.  The sciatic nerve block.

Authors:  S Shevlin; D Johnston; L Turbitt
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  Ultrasound-guided adductor and sciatic nerve block: Two in one approach at mid-thigh level.

Authors:  Amarjeet Kumar; Chandni Sinha; Ajeet Kumar; Poonam Kumari
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

4.  Sonoelastographic evaluation of the sciatic nerve in patients with unilateral lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Umut Orkun Çelebi; Veysel Burulday; Mehmet Faik Özveren; Adil Doğan; Mehmet Hüseyin Akgül
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Single-injection or continuous femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Eric Albrecht; Dorothea Morfey; Vincent Chan; Rajiv Gandhi; Arkadiy Koshkin; Ki Jinn Chin; Sylvie Robinson; Philippe Frascarolo; Richard Brull
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Ultrasound guidance for upper and lower limb blocks.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Anastasia Price; Kevin J Walker; Ken McGrattan; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-11

7.  Comparison of ultrasound-guided anterior versus transgluteal sciatic nerve blockade for knee surgery.

Authors:  Raed A Alsatli
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2012 Jan-Jun

Review 8.  An update around the evidence base for the lower extremity ultrasound regional block technique.

Authors:  Andrea Fanelli; Daniela Ghisi; Rita Maria Melotti
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-01-26

9.  Ultrasound guidance in regional anesthesia: state of the art review through challenging clinical scenarios.

Authors:  Brian D Sites; John G Antonakakis
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2009-01-05

10.  Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block.

Authors:  S Heschl; B Hallmann; T Zilke; G Gemes; M Schoerghuber; M Auer-Grumbach; F Quehenberger; P Lirk; Q Hogan; M Rigaud
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 9.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.