Literature DB >> 16436825

Evaluation of the acetabular labrum at 3.0-T MR imaging compared with 1.5-T MR arthrography: preliminary experience.

Thorsten P Sundberg1, Glen A Toomayan, Nancy M Major.   

Abstract

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare imaging of the acetabular labrum with 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 1.5-T MR arthrography. Eight patients (four male, four female; mean age, 38 years) with hip pain suspicious for labral disease were examined at both MR arthrography and MR imaging. Presence of labral lesions, paralabral cysts, articular cartilage lesions, subchondral cysts, osteophytes, and synovial herniation pits was recorded. There was arthroscopic correlation of findings in five patients. MR imaging depicted four surgically confirmed labral tears that were identified at MR arthrography, as well as one that was not visualized at MR arthrography. MR imaging helped identify all other pathologic conditions that were diagnosed at MR arthrography and helped identify one additional surgically confirmed focal articular cartilage lesion. These results provide encouraging support for evaluation with 3.0-T MR imaging over 1.5-T MR arthrography. (c) RSNA, 2006

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436825     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2382050165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Gemma Hilton; Andoni P Toms; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Radiological diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement].

Authors:  T C Mamisch; S Werlen; C Zilkens; S Trattnig; Y-J Kim; K A Siebenrock; B Bittersohl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  CT assessment of herniation pits: prevalence, characteristics, and potential association with morphological predictors of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Stephanie Panzer; Peter Augat; Ulrich Esch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  3 T magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; N Biccari; F Mangano; R Toffanin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Prevalence of the acetabular sublabral sulcus at MR arthrography in patients under 17 years of age: does it exist?

Authors:  Olaf Magerkurth; Jon A Jacobson; Yoav Morag; David Fessell; Asheesh Bedi; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging findings compared with histological findings of the labrum in hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Shiho Kanezaki; Asako Yamamoto; Shigeru Nakamura; Marie Osawa; Takashi Matsushita
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Normal anatomical variants of the labrum of the hip at magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Eoin C Kavanagh; Miraude E A P M Adriaensen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Accuracy of non-arthrographic 3T MR imaging in evaluation of intra-articular pathology of the hip in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Dorota D Linda; Ali Naraghi; Lucas Murnaghan; Daniel Whelan; Lawrence M White
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Clicking hip in a postmenopausal woman.

Authors:  Len Kelly; Rajiv Gandhi; Anukul Panu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Labral and cartilage abnormalities in young patients with hip pain: accuracy of 3-Tesla indirect MR arthrography.

Authors:  Catherine N Petchprapa; Leon D Rybak; Kevin S Dunham; Riccardo Lattanzi; Michael P Recht
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.