Literature DB >> 16436809

Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions.

Gustav K von Schulthess1, Hans C Steinert, Thomas F Hany.   

Abstract

For the past 5 years, combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), or PET/CT, has grown because the PET portion provides information that is very different from that obtainable with other imaging modalities. However, the paucity of anatomic landmarks on PET images makes a consistent "hardware fusion" to anatomic cross-sectional data extremely useful. Clinical experience indicates a single direction: Addition of CT to PET improves specificity foremost, but also sensitivity, and the addition of PET to CT adds sensitivity and specificity in tumor imaging. Thus, PET/CT is a more accurate test than either of its individual components and is probably also better than side-by-side viewing of images from both modalities. The synergistic advantage of adding CT is that the attenuation correction needed for PET can also be derived from the CT data, an advantage not obtainable by integrating PET and magnetic resonance imaging. This makes PET/CT 25%-30% faster than PET alone with standard attenuation-correction methods, leading to higher patient throughput and a more comfortable examination, which typically last 30 minutes or less. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT appears to provide relevant information in the staging and therapy monitoring of many tumors, including lung carcinoma, mesothelioma, colorectal cancer, lymphoma, melanoma, and many others, with the notable exception of prostatic cancer. For prostatic cancer, choline derivatives may become useful radiopharmaceuticals. The published literature on the applications of FDG PET/CT in oncology is still limited, but several well-designed studies have demonstrated the benefits of PET/CT. (c) RSNA, 2006

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436809     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2382041977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  126 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Hedvig Hricak; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  FDG uptake in vaginal tampons is caused by urinary contamination and related to tampon position.

Authors:  Irene A Burger; David A Scheiner; David W Crook; Valerie Treyer; Thomas F Hany; Gustav K von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Evaluation of the spatial dependence of the point spread function in 2D PET image reconstruction using LOR-OSEM.

Authors:  D Wiant; J A Gersh; M Bennett; J D Bourland
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  An Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of Primary Display Devices.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  Anthony Visioni; Julian Kim
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  A Pilot Study of Texture Analysis of Primary Tumor [18F]FDG Uptake to Predict Recurrence in Surgically Treated Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Megumi Jinguji; Tetsuya Shinaji; Masaya Aoki; Atsushi Tani; Yoshiaki Nakabeppu; Masayuki Nakajo; Masami Sato; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Multiplexed imaging in cancer diagnosis: applications and future advances.

Authors:  Hisataka Kobayashi; Michelle R Longmire; Mikako Ogawa; Peter L Choyke; Satomi Kawamoto
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Instant gratification must wait.

Authors:  Chaitanya Divgi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Which radionuclides will nuclear oncology need tomorrow?

Authors:  Jacques Barbet; Jean-François Chatal; François Gauché; Jacques Martino
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Time to Progression of Pancreatic Cancer: Evaluation with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Su Joa Ahn; Seung Joon Choi; Hyung Sik Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.