Literature DB >> 16436572

Creating an infrastructure for training in the responsible conduct of research: the University of Pittsburgh's experience.

Barbara E Barnes1, Charles P Friedman, Jerome L Rosenberg, Joanne Russell, Ari Beedle, Arthur S Levine.   

Abstract

In response to public concerns about the consequences of research misconduct, academic institutions have become increasingly cognizant of the need to implement comprehensive, effective training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) for faculty, staff, students, and external collaborators. The ability to meet this imperative is challenging as universities confront declining financial resources and increasing complexity of the research enterprise. The authors describe the University of Pittsburgh's design, implementation, and evaluation of a Web-based, institution-wide RCR training program called Research and Practice Fundamentals (RPF). This project, established in 2000, was embedded in the philosophy, organizational structure, and technology developed through the Integrated Advanced Information Management Systems grant from the National Library of Medicine. Utilizing a centralized, comprehensive approach, the RPF system provides an efficient mechanism for deploying content to a large, diverse cohort of learners and supports the needs of research administrators by providing access to information about who has successfully completed the training. During its first 3 years of operation, the RPF served over 17,000 users and issued more than 38,000 training certificates. The 18 modules that are currently available address issues required by regulatory mandates and other content areas important to the research community. RPF users report high levels of satisfaction with content and ease of using the system. Future efforts must explore methods to integrate non-RCR education and training into a centralized, cohesive structure. The University of Pittsburgh's experience with the RPF demonstrates the importance of developing an infrastructure for training that is comprehensive, scalable, reliable, centralized, affordable, and sustainable.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436572     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200602000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of a self-paced learning module to teach responsible literature searching for research.

Authors:  Charles B Wessel; Nancy Hrinya Tannery; Barbara A Epstein
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2010-01

Review 2.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.

Authors:  E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Evolution of an innovative approach to the delivery of in-person training in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Karen L Schmidt; Laurel Yasko; Michael Green; Jane Alexander; Christopher Ryan
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Stephen T Murphy; Ethan P Waples; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-09-01

6.  Education of research ethics for clinical investigators with Moodle tool.

Authors:  Arja Halkoaho; Mari Matveinen; Ville Leinonen; Kirsi Luoto; Tapani Keränen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Good Clinical Practice Training: Identifying Key Elements and Strategies for Increasing Training Efficiency.

Authors:  Jaime Arango; Tina Chuck; Susan S Ellenberg; Bridget Foltz; Colleen Gorman; Heidi Hinrichs; Susan McHale; Kunal Merchant; Jonathan Seltzer; Stephanie Shapley; Gretchen Wild
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 1.778

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.