Literature DB >> 16435698

Sharing control between humans and automation using haptic interface: primary and secondary task performance benefits.

Paul G Griffiths1, R Brent Gillespie.   

Abstract

This paper describes a paradigm for human/automation control sharing in which the automation acts through a motor coupled to a machine's manual control interface. The manual interface becomes a haptic display, continually informing the human about automation actions. While monitoring by feel, users may choose either to conform to the automation or override it and express their own control intentions. This paper's objective is to demonstrate that adding automation through haptic display can be used not only to improve performance on a primary task but also to reduce perceptual demands or free attention for a secondary task. Results are presented from three experiments in which 11 participants completed a lane-following task using a motorized steering wheel on a fixed-base driving simulator. The automation behaved like a copilot, assisting with lane following by applying torques to the steering wheel. Results indicate that haptic assist improves lane following by least 30%, p < .0001, while reducing visual demand by 29%, p < .0001, or improving reaction time in a secondary tone localization task by 18 ms, p = .0009. Potential applications of this research include the design of automation interfaces based on haptics that support human/automation control sharing better than traditional push-button automation interfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16435698     DOI: 10.1518/001872005774859944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  6 in total

Review 1.  Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alva O Ferdinand; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Can robots help the learning of skilled actions?

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; James L Patton
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.230

3.  Transitions Between Highly Automated and Longitudinally Assisted Driving: The Role of the Initiator in the Fight for Authority.

Authors:  Davide Maggi; Richard Romano; Oliver Carsten
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Haptic Guidance Needs to Be Intuitive Not Just Informative to Improve Human Motor Accuracy.

Authors:  Winfred Mugge; Irene A Kuling; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Haptic Lane-Keeping Assistance for Truck Driving: A Test Track Study.

Authors:  Jeroen Roozendaal; Emma Johansson; Joost de Winter; David Abbink; Sebastiaan Petermeijer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.

Authors:  Husam Muslim; Makoto Itoh
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.888

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.