PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the enamel thickness of the maxillary primary incisors of preterm children with very low birth weight (< 1,500 g) compared to full-term children with normal birth weight. METHODS: A total of 90 exfoliated maxillary primary central incisors were investigated using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Three serial buccolingual ground sections of each tooth were examined under light microscopy, and maximum dimensions of the prenatally and postnatally formed enamel were measured. RESULTS: The enamel of preterm teeth was approximately 20% thinner than that for full-term teeth. Most of the reduction was observed in the prenatally formed enamel. This was 5 to 13 times thinner than that for full-term children (P<.001). The "catch-up" thickness of postnatally formed enamel did not compensate fully for the decrease in prenatal enamel (P<.001). Although none of the teeth used in this study had enamel defects visible to the naked eye, 52% of preterm teeth showed enamel hypoplasia under SEM, compared with only 16% found on full-term teeth (P<.001). These defects were present as pits or irregular, shallow areas of missing enamel. CONCLUSIONS: Preterm primary dental enamel is abnormal in surface quality, and is significantly thinner compared to full-term enamel. The thinner enamel is due mainly to reduced prenatal growth and results in smaller dimensions of the primary dentition.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the enamel thickness of the maxillary primary incisors of preterm children with very low birth weight (< 1,500 g) compared to full-term children with normal birth weight. METHODS: A total of 90 exfoliated maxillary primary central incisors were investigated using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Three serial buccolingual ground sections of each tooth were examined under light microscopy, and maximum dimensions of the prenatally and postnatally formed enamel were measured. RESULTS: The enamel of preterm teeth was approximately 20% thinner than that for full-term teeth. Most of the reduction was observed in the prenatally formed enamel. This was 5 to 13 times thinner than that for full-term children (P<.001). The "catch-up" thickness of postnatally formed enamel did not compensate fully for the decrease in prenatal enamel (P<.001). Although none of the teeth used in this study had enamel defects visible to the naked eye, 52% of preterm teeth showed enamel hypoplasia under SEM, compared with only 16% found on full-term teeth (P<.001). These defects were present as pits or irregular, shallow areas of missing enamel. CONCLUSIONS: Preterm primary dental enamel is abnormal in surface quality, and is significantly thinner compared to full-term enamel. The thinner enamel is due mainly to reduced prenatal growth and results in smaller dimensions of the primary dentition.
Authors: Laura Jackeline Garcia Rincon; Gizelton Pereira Alencar; Marly Augusto Cardoso; Paulo Capel Narvai; Paulo Frazão Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 3.240