Literature DB >> 1643505

Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences.

J F Connolly1, N A Phillips, S H Stewart, W G Brake.   

Abstract

This experiment was concerned with the effects of phonologically correct masking on the electrophysiological responses to terminal words of spoken sentences differing in contextual constraint. Two event-related potential (ERP) components, the N400 and N200, were recorded to the terminal words of high and low constraint sentences in four conditions. In the Control condition, subjects (Ss) simply attended to the sentences with no explicit task instructions. In the Semantic condition, Ss were required to listen to the stimuli in order to make semantic judgements about the terminal word of each sentence. The Control+Masking condition was identical to the Control condition except for the simultaneous presentation of a masking stimulus. The Semantic+Masking condition had Ss listening to sentences in the presence of masking with the task of making semantic judgements about the terminal word of each sentence. ERPs were recorded from Fz, Cz, Pz, T3, and T4 in 10 subjects. Amplitudes of both the N200 and the N400 were sensitive to contextual constraint with larger responses elicited by the terminal words of low constraint sentences. In addition to demonstrating the co-occurrence of the N200 and N400, this experiment highlighted a functional separation between the two components. Masking had no statistically significant effect on N200 latency but N400 latency was delayed in the masked conditions relative to those in the unmasked conditions. It is proposed that the N200 and N400 are manifestations of two different processes; the N200 reflects the acoustic/phonological processing of the terminal word while the N400 reflects the cognitive/linguistic processing. The relationship between the N200 recorded in this experiment and the discrimination N200 is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1643505     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(92)90018-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  20 in total

1.  Temporally selective attention supports speech processing in 3- to 5-year-old children.

Authors:  Lori B Astheimer; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 2.  The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Recognition of affective prosody in brain-damaged patients and healthy controls: a neurophysiological study using EEG and whole-head MEG.

Authors:  Boris Kotchoubey; Jochen Kaiser; Vladimir Bostanov; Werner Lutzenberger; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity.

Authors:  Amy S Desroches; Randy Lynn Newman; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The phonemic restoration effect reveals pre-N400 effect of supportive sentence context in speech perception.

Authors:  David M Groppe; Marvin Choi; Tiffany Huang; Joseph Schilz; Ben Topkins; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Separating phonological and semantic processing in auditory sentence processing: a high-resolution event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Ryan C N D'Arcy; John F Connolly; Elisabet Service; Colin S Hawco; Michael E Houlihan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Auditory word perception in sentence context in reading-disabled children.

Authors:  Maria Mody; Daniel T Wehner; Seppo P Ahlfors
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Temperamental contributions to children's performance in an emotion-word processing task: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Working memory is partially preserved during sleep.

Authors:  Jérôme Daltrozzo; Léa Claude; Barbara Tillmann; Hélène Bastuji; Fabien Perrin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) Effects Reflect Controlled Rather than Automatic Mechanisms of Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Jérôme Daltrozzo; Norma Wioland; Boris Kotchoubey
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2012-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.