Literature DB >> 16433601

The effect of antipyretic therapy upon outcomes in critically ill patients: a randomized, prospective study.

Carl I Schulman1, Nicholas Namias, James Doherty, Ronald J Manning, Pamela Li, Pam Li, Ahmed Elhaddad, Ahmed Alhaddad, David Lasko, Jose Amortegui, Christopher J Dy, Lucie Dlugasch, Gio Baracco, Stephen M Cohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the large body of evidence suggesting a beneficial role of fever in the host response, antipyretic therapy is commonly employed for febrile critically ill patients. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of antipyretic therapy strategies on the outcomes of critically ill patients.
METHODS: Patients admitted to the Trauma Intensive Care Unit over a nine-month period were eligible for inclusion, except those with traumatic brain injury. Patients were randomized on day three of the ICU stay into aggressive or permissive groups. The aggressive group received acetaminophen 650 mg every 6 h for temperature of >38.5 degrees C and a cooling blanket was added for temperature of >39.5 degrees C. The permissive group received no treatment for temperature of >38.5 degrees C, but instead had treatment initiated at temperature of >40 degrees C, at which time acetaminophen and cooling blankets were used until temperature was <40 degrees C. Patient demographics, daily temperatures, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) scores, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) scores, and infections and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Between December, 2002 and September, 2003, 572 patients were screened, of whom 82 met criteria for enrollment. Forty-four patients were randomized to the aggressive group and 38 patients were randomized to the permissive group for a total of 961 and 751 ICU days, respectively. There were 131 infections in the aggressive group and 85 infections in the permissive group (4 +/- 6 vs. 3 +/- 2 infections per patient, p = 0.26). There were seven deaths in the aggressive group and only one death in the permissive group (p = 0.06, Fisher Exact Test). The study was stopped after the first interim analysis due to the mortality difference, related to the issues of waiver of consent and the mandate for minimal risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Aggressively treating fever in critically ill patients may lead to a higher mortality rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16433601     DOI: 10.1089/sur.2005.6.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1096-2964            Impact factor:   2.150


  56 in total

Review 1.  The effect on mortality of antipyretics in the treatment of influenza infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally Eyers; Mark Weatherall; Philippa Shirtcliffe; Kyle Perrin; Richard Beasley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Clinical and demographic factors associated with antipyretic use in gram-negative severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Brian M Fuller; Lee P Skrupky; Hawnwan Moy; Robert Alunday; Scott T Micek; Richard E Fagley
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Early peak temperature and mortality in critically ill patients with or without infection.

Authors:  Paul Jeffrey Young; Manoj Saxena; Richard Beasley; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael Bailey; David Pilcher; Simon Finfer; David Harrison; John Myburgh; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Fever: suppress or let it ride?

Authors:  Juliet J Ray; Carl I Schulman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Hypothesis: Fever control, a niche for alpha-2 agonists in the setting of septic shock and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Authors:  F Petitjeans; S Leroy; C Pichot; A Geloen; M Ghignone; L Quintin
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2018-05-22

6.  Counterpoint: Should antipyretic therapy be given routinely to febrile patients in septic shock? No.

Authors:  Anne M Drewry; Richard S Hotchkiss
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  Controversies in the temperature management of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Yasufumi Nakajima
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Diet-induced obesity attenuates the hypothermic response to lipopolysaccharide independently of TNF-α production.

Authors:  Evilin N Komegae; Monique T Fonseca; Alexandre A Steiner
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2020-01-09

9.  Febrile temperature change modulates CD4 T cell differentiation via a TRPV channel-regulated Notch-dependent pathway.

Authors:  Danish Umar; Arundhoti Das; Suman Gupta; Somdeb Chattopadhyay; Debayan Sarkar; Gauri Mirji; Jeet Kalia; Gopalakrishnan Aneeshkumar Arimbasseri; Jeannine Marie Durdik; Satyajit Rath; Anna George; Vineeta Bal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Acetaminophen has limited antipyretic activity in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Rachel S Greenberg; Hegang Chen; Jeffrey D Hasday
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.425

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.