Literature DB >> 16432713

Nocodazole does not synchronize cells: implications for cell-cycle control and whole-culture synchronization.

Stephen Cooper1, Geetha Iyer, Michael Tarquini, Patrick Bissett.   

Abstract

It has been predicted that nocodazole-inhibited cells are not synchronized because nocodazole-arrested cells with a G2-phase amount of DNA would not have a narrow cell-size range reflecting the cell size of some specific, presumably G2-phase, cell-cycle age. Size measurements of nocodazole-inhibited cells now fully confirm this prediction. Further, release from nocodazole inhibition does not produce cells that move through the cell cycle mimicking the passage of normal unperturbed cells through the cell cycle. Nocodazole, an archetypal whole-culture synchronization method, can inhibit growth to produce cells with a G2-phase amount of DNA, but such cells are not synchronized. Cells produced by a selective (i.e., non-whole-culture) method not only have a specific DNA content, but also have a narrow size distribution. The current view of cell-cycle control that is based on methods that are not suitable for cell-cycle analysis must therefore be reconsidered when results are based on whole-culture synchronization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432713     DOI: 10.1007/s00441-005-0118-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Res        ISSN: 0302-766X            Impact factor:   5.249


  9 in total

1.  Thymidine block does not synchronize L1210 mouse leukaemic cells: implications for cell cycle control, cell cycle analysis and whole-culture synchronization.

Authors:  S Cooper; K Z Chen; S Ravi
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Evaluation of mammalian cell-free systems of nuclear disassembly and assembly.

Authors:  Dominique C Vaillant; Micheline Paulin-Levasseur
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Proteomic analysis of the response to cell cycle arrests in human myeloid leukemia cells.

Authors:  Tony Ly; Aki Endo; Angus I Lamond
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Using standard optical flow cytometry for synchronizing proliferating cells in the G1 phase.

Authors:  Manuela Vecsler; Itay Lazar; Amit Tzur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Chromatin proteins and RNA are associated with DNA during all phases of mitosis.

Authors:  Kathryn L Black; Svetlana Petruk; Tyler K Fenstermaker; Jacob W Hodgson; Jeffrey L Caplan; Hugh W Brock; Alexander Mazo
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 10.849

6.  PTBP1 mRNA isoforms and regulation of their translation.

Authors:  Luisa M Arake de Tacca; Mia C Pulos-Holmes; Stephen N Floor; Jamie H D Cate
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analyses Provide Insights into the Growth and Development Advantages of Triploid Apostichopus japonicus.

Authors:  Jiahui Xie; Yi Sun; Yue Cao; Lingshu Han; Yuanxin Li; Beichen Ding; Chuang Gao; Pengfei Hao; Xin Jin; Yaqing Chang; Jian Song; Donghong Yin; Jun Ding
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Nuclear DNA methylation and chromatin condensation phenotypes are distinct between normally proliferating/aging, rapidly growing/immortal, and senescent cells.

Authors:  Jin Ho Oh; Arkadiusz Gertych; Jian Tajbakhsh
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2013-03

9.  Preferential potentiation of topoisomerase I poison cytotoxicity by PARP inhibition in S phase.

Authors:  P Znojek; E Willmore; N J Curtin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.