Literature DB >> 16432642

Stoppa procedure in bilateral inguinal hernia.

Rosa Fernández-Lobato1, Aurea Tartas-Ruiz, Francisco Javier Jiménez-Miramón, Francisco Javier Marín-Lucas, Juan Carlos Ruiz de Adana-Belbel, Manuel Limones Esteban.   

Abstract

The Stoppa procedure is a very safe repair of bilateral inguinal hernia, but it requires a learning period to achieve optimal results. We present a study with our experience and learning curve for this technique. Two hundred and ten patients with bilateral inguinal hernia (420 hernias) were repaired with Stoppa procedure from January 1995 to December 2003 with an average age of 57.2 years (range 28-89 years), with 8 women and 202 men (96%). Emergency surgery was performed for incarcerated hernia in six cases (2.8%). The rates of recurrent hernias, concomitant disease and associated surgical techniques were similar in all the years. Operative time decreased from 100 min (1995) to 61-66 min (2001-2003). Drain remained in place in 100% (1995), and 0% (2003). Regional anaesthesia was performed in 25% (1995) and 80-90% in the last years; hospital stay decreased from 5.1 to 1.2 days (2003), and morbidity from 50% (1995) to 12-16% (P<0.0001). There were three recurrences, two in the first 30 cases (6.6%), and one in the remaining 180 (0.5%) (4-92 months follow-up). The procedure was introduced in 1995 by one surgeon, performing 100% of cases, being accepted progressively by other surgeons. The first 25-30 cases of a surgical technique are the learning curve, with the highest rate of morbidity, time, technical and operative difficulties, and long hospital stay. As a result of the first surgeon's experience, some modifications of the technique are developed and results improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432642     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-005-0061-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  16 in total

1.  Laparoscopic training: results of a Belgian survey in trainees. Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery (BGES).

Authors:  B Navez; F Penninckx
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.090

2.  Prospective evaluation of the giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac for recurrent and complex bilateral inguinal hernias.

Authors:  C C Solorzano; R M Minter; T C Childers; J W Kilkenny; J N Vauthey
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. A safe approach based on the understanding of rectus sheath anatomy.

Authors:  N Katkhouda; G M Campos; E Mavor; A Trussler; M Khalil; R Stoppa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac.

Authors:  G E Wantz
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1989-11

5.  Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  R Bittner; S Sauerland; C-G Schmedt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  C G Schmedt; S Sauerland; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Comparison of quality-of-life outcomes of Stoppa vs bilateral Lichtenstein procedure.

Authors:  M Koc; A K Aslar; O Yoldas; T Ertan; M Kilic; E Gocmen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Long-term results of giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac for complex recurrent inguinal hernia.

Authors:  G L Beets; D van Geldere; C G Baeten; P M Go
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial.

Authors:  D L Stoker; D J Spiegelhalter; R Singh; J M Wellwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-05-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Inguinal hernia repair in Switzerland.

Authors:  C Tschuor; J Metzger; P-A Clavien; R Vonlanthen; K Lehmann
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or open approach?

Authors:  X Feliu; R Clavería; P Besora; J Camps; E Fernández-Sallent; X Viñas; J M Abad
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of bilateral primary inguinal hernia: A three-armed Randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M M Elmessiry; A A Gebaly
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-09-09

4.  Inguinal hernia repair with the peduncled fascial flap: a new surgical technique.

Authors:  R Kuśnierczyk; W Piatkowski; A Wójcik
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.739

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.