Literature DB >> 16432640

A new mark test for mirror self-recognition in non-human primates.

Adolf Heschl1, Judith Burkart.   

Abstract

For 30 years Gallup's (Science 167:86-87, 1970) mark test, which consists of confronting a mirror-experienced test animal with its own previously altered mirror image, usually a color mark on forehead, eyebrow or ear, has delivered valuable results about the distribution of visual self-recognition in non-human primates. Chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans and, less frequently, gorillas can learn to correctly understand the reflection of their body in a mirror. However, the standard version of the mark test is good only for positively proving the existence of self-recognition. Conclusive statements about the lack of self-recognition are more difficult because of the methodological constraints of the test. This situation has led to a persistent controversy about the power of Gallup's original technique. We devised a new variant of the test which permits more unequivocal decisions about both the presence and absence of self-recognition. This new procedure was tested with marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus), following extensive training with mirror-related tasks to facilitate performance in the standard mark test. The results show that a slightly altered mark test with a new marking substance (chocolate cream) can help to reliably discriminate between true negative results, indicating a real lack of ability to recognize oneself in a mirror, from false negative results that are due to methodological particularities of the standard test. Finally, an evolutionary hypothesis is put forward as to why many primates can use a mirror instrumentally - i.e. know how to use it for grasping at hidden objects - while failing in the decisive mark test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432640     DOI: 10.1007/s10329-005-0170-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Primates        ISSN: 0032-8332            Impact factor:   2.163


  20 in total

1.  Observations on the behavior of gibbons (Hylobates leucogenys, H. gabriellae, and H. lar) in the presence of mirrors.

Authors:  M Ujhelyi; B Merker; P Buk; T Geissmann
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Mirror self-image reactions before age two.

Authors:  B Amsterdam
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.038

3.  Cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) fail to show mirror-guided self-exploration.

Authors:  M D Hauser; C T Miller; K Liu; R Gupta
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus oedipus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  True imitation in marmosets.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Artifactual kinds and functional design features: what a primate understands without language.

Authors:  M D Hauser
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-09

7.  Mirror responses in a group of Miopithecus talapoin.

Authors:  Sandra Posada; Montserrat Colell
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2005-02-05       Impact factor: 2.163

8.  An ethogram of the common marmoset (Calithrix jacchus jacchus): general behavioural repertoire.

Authors:  M F Stevenson; T B Poole
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) spatial problem solving with the use of mirrors and televised equivalents of mirrors.

Authors:  E W Menzel; E S Savage-Rumbaugh; J Lawson
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Developmental biology of the common marmoset: proposal for a "postnatal staging".

Authors:  M Missler; J R Wolff; H Rothe; W Heger; H J Merker; A Treiber; R Scheid; G A Crook
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 0.667

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Mirror self-recognition: a review and critique of attempts to promote and engineer self-recognition in primates.

Authors:  James R Anderson; Gordon G Gallup
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Spontaneous expression of mirror self-recognition in monkeys after learning precise visual-proprioceptive association for mirror images.

Authors:  Liangtang Chang; Shikun Zhang; Mu-Ming Poo; Neng Gong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Investigating individual differences in chimpanzee mirror self-recognition and cortical thickness: A vertex-based and region-of-interest analysis.

Authors:  William D Hopkins; Robert D Latzman; Lindsay M Mahovetz; Xiang Li; Neil Roberts
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  A neuroanatomical predictor of mirror self-recognition in chimpanzees.

Authors:  E E Hecht; L M Mahovetz; T M Preuss; W D Hopkins
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  A comparative study of mirror self-recognition in three corvid species.

Authors:  Lisa-Claire Vanhooland; Anita Szabó; Thomas Bugnyar; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 6.  Comparative connectomics of the primate social brain.

Authors:  Chihiro Yokoyama; Joonas A Autio; Takuro Ikeda; Jérôme Sallet; Rogier B Mars; David C Van Essen; Matthew F Glasser; Norihiro Sadato; Takuya Hayashi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 7.400

7.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) respond to video images of themselves.

Authors:  James R Anderson; Hika Kuroshima; Annika Paukner; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  The evolution of primate visual self-recognition: evidence of absence in lesser apes.

Authors:  Thomas Suddendorf; Emma Collier-Baker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Which primates recognize themselves in mirrors?

Authors:  James R Anderson; Gordon G Gallup
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Preschool children fail primate prosocial game because of attentional task demands.

Authors:  Judith Maria Burkart; Katja Rueth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.