Literature DB >> 16432482

An observational cohort study of Chlamydia trachomatis treatment in pregnancy.

Lisa Rahangdale1, Sarah Guerry, Heidi M Bauer, Laura Packel, Miriam Rhew, Roger Baxter, Joan Chow, Gail Bolan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Currently, azithromycin is not considered a first-line treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women. We evaluated the use, efficacy, and safety of azithromycin compared with erythromycin and amoxicillin in the treatment of genital chlamydial infection during pregnancy.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women with genital chlamydial infection. Data on antibiotics prescribed, test-of-cure (TOC) results, and maternal and infant complications were collected from medical records.
RESULTS: Of the 277 women in the study sample, 69% were initially prescribed azithromycin, 9% amoxicillin, and 19% erythromycin. Eight-one percent of subjects had a TOC 7 or more days after diagnosis and before delivery. Treatment efficacy, as defined by a negative TOC, was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.9-99.2) for azithromycin, 95% (95% CI, 76.2-99.9) for amoxicillin, and 64% (95% CI, 44.1-81.4) for erythromycin. The efficacy of azithromycin was significantly higher than erythromycin (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in efficacy by age, race/ethnicity, concurrent sexually transmitted disease diagnosis, partner treatment, or substance use. Furthermore, there was no difference in complications for women or infants exposed to azithromycin compared with those treated with other regimens.
CONCLUSION: Clinical outcome data from this study population of women and infants support both efficacy and safety of azithromycin for treatment of C. trachomatis in pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432482     DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000187226.32145.ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  7 in total

1.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Gail A Bolan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-06-05

2.  A comparison of clinical features between chlamydial and non-chlamydial urethritis in men negative for gonococcal infection who attended a urological outpatient clinic in Japan.

Authors:  Toshifumi Kurahashi; Hideaki Miyake; Yuzo Nakano; Masashi Shinozaki; Nobutoshi Oka; Kazushi Tanaka; Atsushi Takenaka; Isao Hara; Soichi Arakawa; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Author's Reply.

Authors:  M S Najar; C L Saldanha; K A Banday
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2010-04

4.  Pregnancy outcomes in women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis: a population-based cohort study in Washington State.

Authors:  Magaly M Blas; Fredy A Canchihuaman; Isaac E Alva; Stephen E Hawes
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 5.  Azithromycin plus chloroquine: combination therapy for protection against malaria and sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy.

Authors:  R Matthew Chico; Daniel Chandramohan
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 4.481

6.  Non-standard treatment for uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jessica Krahn; Aaron Louette; Vera Caine; Shalane Ha; Tom Wong; Tim T Y Lau; Ameeta E Singh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  On the pathway to better birth outcomes? A systematic review of azithromycin and curable sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  R Matthew Chico; Berkin B Hack; Melanie J Newport; Enesia Ngulube; Daniel Chandramohan
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.091

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.