Literature DB >> 16432352

Very late results of esophagomyotomy for patients with achalasia: clinical, endoscopic, histologic, manometric, and acid reflux studies in 67 patients for a mean follow-up of 190 months.

Attila Csendes1, Italo Braghetto, Patricio Burdiles, Owen Korn, Paula Csendes, Ana Henríquez.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic esophagomyotomy is the preferred approach to patients with achalasia of the esophagus, However, there are very few long-term follow-up studies (>10 years) in these patients.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a very late subjective and objective follow-up in a group of 67 patients submitted to esophagomyotomy plus a partial antireflux surgery (Dor's technique).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study that lasted 30 years, 67 patients submitted to surgery were divided into 3 groups: group I followed for 80 to 119 months (15 patients); group II, with follow-up of 120 to 239 months (35 patients); and group III, with follow-up more than 240 months (17 patients). They were submitted to clinical questionnaire, endoscopic evaluation, histologic analysis, radiologic studies, manometric determinations, and 24-hour pH studies late after surgery.
RESULTS: Three patients developed a squamous cell esophageal carcinoma 5, 7, and 15 years after surgery. At the late follow-up, Visick III and IV were seen in 7%, 23%, and 35%, according to the length of follow-up of each group. Endoscopic examination revealed a progressive nonsignificant deterioration of esophageal mucosa, histologic analysis distal to squamous-columnar junction showed a significant decrease of fundic mucosa in patients of group III, with increase of intestinal metaplasia, although not significant time. Lower esophageal sphincter showed a significant decrease of resting pressure 1 year after surgery, which remained similar at the late control. There was no return to peristaltic activity. Acid reflux measured by 24-hour pH studies revealed a progressive increase, and the follow-up was longer. Nine patients developed Barrett esophagus: 6 of them a short-segment and 3 a long-segment Barrett esophagus. Final clinical results in all 67 patients demonstrated excellent or good results in 73% of the cases, development of epidermoid carcinoma in 4.5%, and failures in 22.4% of the patients, mainly due to reflux esophagitis. Incomplete myotomy was seen in only 1 case.
CONCLUSION: In patients with achalasia submitted to esophagomyotomy and Dor's antireflux procedure, there is a progressive clinical deterioration of initially good results if a very long follow-up is performed (23 years after surgery), mainly due to an increase in pathologic acid reflux disease and the development of short- or long-segment Barrett esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432352      PMCID: PMC1448918          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000197469.12632.e0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  38 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of achalasia: results with esophagomyotomy and Belsey repair.

Authors:  A G Little; A Soriano; M K Ferguson; C S Winans; D B Skinner
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Esophagomyotomy versus forceful dilation for achalasia of the esophagus: results in 899 patients.

Authors:  N Okike; W S Payne; D M Neufeld; P E Bernatz; P C Pairolero; D R Sanderson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Laparoscopic heller myotomy and anterior fundoplication for achalasia results in a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  M S Yamamura; J C Gilster; B S Myers; C W Deveney; B C Sheppard
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

4.  Return of esophageal peristalsis in idiopathic achalasia.

Authors:  M H Mellow
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Achalasia of the cardia: long-term results of oesophagomyotomy and posterior partial fundoplication.

Authors:  P Parrilla Paricio; L Martínez de Haro; A Ortiz; J L Aguayo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Achalasia.

Authors:  J C Reynolds; H P Parkman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 7.  Comparison of forceful dilatation and esophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia of the esophagus.

Authors:  A Csendes; I Braghetto; P Burdiles; P Csendes
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1991-12

Review 8.  Results of surgical treatment of achalasia of the esophagus.

Authors:  A Csendes
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1991-12

9.  Return of esophageal peristalsis after Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia.

Authors:  J Ponce; M Miralbés; V Garrigues; J Berenguer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Surgery for achalasia: long-term results in operated achalasic patients.

Authors:  H C Liu; B S Huang; W H Hsu; C J Huang; S H Hou; M H Huang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.520

View more
  48 in total

1.  Does illness severity matter? A comparison of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication and esophageal dilation for achalasia.

Authors:  Jason F Reynoso; Manish M Tiwari; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson; Timothy M Farrell; Geoffrey P Kohn; Vedra Augenstein; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Data analyses and perspectives on laparoscopic surgery for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Nobuo Omura; Fumiaki Yano; Masato Hoshino; Se-Ryung Yamamoto; Shunsuke Akimoto; Takahiro Masuda; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of POEM for achalasia.

Authors:  Lavinia A Barbieri; Cesare Hassan; Riccardo Rosati; Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Loredana Correale; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Lessons learned from surgical management of achalasia: does "cardia" result from pouch-like transformation of distal esophagus?

Authors:  Johannes Lenglinger; Margit Eisler; Martin Riegler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Laparoscopic Heller myotomy: technical aspects and operative pitfalls.

Authors:  Khashayar Vaziri; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  [Technical aspects of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia].

Authors:  I Gockel; S Timm; T J Musholt; A Rink; H Lang
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Significance of limited hiatal dissection in surgery for achalasia.

Authors:  Aleksandar Petar Simić; Nebojsa S Radovanović; Ognjan M Skrobić; Zoran J Raznatović; Predrag M Pesko
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  The outcome of laparoscopic surgery with and without short gastric vessel division for achalasia.

Authors:  Yasunori Akutsu; Naoyuki Hanari; Tsuguaki Kono; Masaya Uesato; Isamu Hoshino; Kentaro Murakami; Toshiyuki Natsume; Yuka Isozaki; Naoki Akanuma; Takeshi Toyozumi; Hiroshi Suito; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

10.  Achalasia - an update.

Authors:  Joel E Richter
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.