Literature DB >> 16432168

Cetuximab preclinical antitumor activity (monotherapy and combination based) is not predicted by relative total or activated epidermal growth factor receptor tumor expression levels.

Robert Wild1, Krista Fager, Christine Flefleh, David Kan, Ivan Inigo, Stephen Castaneda, Feng Roger Luo, Amy Camuso, Kelly McGlinchey, William C Rose.   

Abstract

Although Erbitux (cetuximab) has proven therapeutic benefit in the clinical setting, the molecular determinants predicting responsiveness to this agent are still not very well understood. Here, we assessed the relationship between basal total and activated (pY1068) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) levels in a tumor and the responsiveness to cetuximab monotherapy or combination-based treatment using human xenograft models. Cetuximab treatment alone (0.25-1 mg/mouse/injection, q3d, i.p.) effectively delayed the growth of GEO and L2987 tumors by a minimum of 10 days corresponding to log cell kill values of >or=1.0. Borderline activity was seen in the A549 and WiDr xenografts. However, cetuximab failed to show any significant antitumor activity in the HT29, HCT116, LOVO, Colo205, LX-1, HCC70, and N87 models. All of the studied tumors had detectable yet variable levels of EGFR. For combination regimens, cetuximab (1 mg/mouse/injection, q3dx5, i.p.) and cisplatin (4.5 mg/kg/injection, q3dx5, i.v.) proved to be significantly more efficacious than individual monotherapies in the cisplatin-refractory yet cetuximab-responsive GEO tumor model (P < 0.001). However, no therapeutic enhancement was observed in the cisplatin and cetuximab weakly responsive A549 xenograft. Similarly, combinations of CPT-11 (48 mg/kg/injection, q3dx5, i.v.) with cetuximab (1 mg/mouse/injection, q3dx5, i.p.) failed to show any improvements over individual monotherapies in the cetuximab resistant/weakly responsive HT29, A549, and WiDr models. We conclude that preclinical activity associated with cetuximab monotherapy does not correlate directly with relative basal levels of total or activated (pY1068) EGFR in a tumor. Moreover, robust single-agent activity by cetuximab may be the best predictor for this agent to potentiate chemotherapy-mediated antitumor activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432168     DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  32 in total

1.  Cetuximab: preclinical evaluation of a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR for radioimmunodiagnostic and radioimmunotherapeutic applications.

Authors:  Diane E Milenic; Karen J Wong; Kwamena E Baidoo; Geoffrey L Ray; Kayhan Garmestani; Mark Williams; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.099

2.  SPSB1, a Novel Negative Regulator of the Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Pathway Targeting the Type II Receptor.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Thao Nheu; Rodney Luwor; Sandra E Nicholson; Hong-Jian Zhu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Dovitinib (TKI258), a multi-target angiokinase inhibitor, is effective regardless of KRAS or BRAF mutation status in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Choong-Kun Lee; Myung Eun Lee; Won Suk Lee; Jeong Min Kim; Kyu Hyun Park; Tae Soo Kim; Kang Young Lee; Joong Bae Ahn; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sun Young Rha
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  A fluorescent imaging method for analyzing the biodistribution of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies that can distinguish intact antibodies from their breakdown products.

Authors:  Takuo Suzuki; Chihiro Miyazaki; Akiko Ishii-Watabe; Minoru Tada; Kumiko Sakai-Kato; Toru Kawanishi; Nana Kawasaki
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.857

5.  The combinational therapy of trastuzumab and cetuximab inhibits tumor growth in a patient-derived tumor xenograft model of gastric cancer.

Authors:  C J Wang; P J Tong; M Y Zhu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Relevance of MET activation and genetic alterations of KRAS and E-cadherin for cetuximab sensitivity of gastric cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Stefan Heindl; Evelyn Eggenstein; Simone Keller; Julia Kneissl; Gisela Keller; Kathrin Mutze; Sandra Rauser; Georg Gasteiger; Ingo Drexler; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Heinz Höfler; Birgit Luber
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Bioluminescence Imaging Enhances Analysis of Drug Responses in a Patient-Derived Xenograft Model of Pediatric ALL.

Authors:  Luke Jones; Jennifer Richmond; Kathryn Evans; Hernan Carol; Duohui Jing; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Catherine A Billups; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith; Richard B Lock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  A wortmannin-cetuximab as a double drug.

Authors:  R Adam Smith; Hushan Yuan; Ralph Weissleder; Lewis C Cantley; Lee Josephson
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.774

9.  Phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor on tumor-associated endothelial cells is a primary target for therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Toshio Kuwai; Toru Nakamura; Takamitsu Sasaki; Sun-Jin Kim; Dominic Fan; Gabriel J Villares; Maya Zigler; Hua Wang; Menashe Bar-Eli; Robert S Kerbel; Isaiah J Fidler
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.715

10.  Role of polymorphic Fc gamma receptor IIIa and EGFR expression level in cetuximab mediated, NK cell dependent in vitro cytotoxicity of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Andrés López-Albaitero; Steve C Lee; Sarah Morgan; Jennifer R Grandis; William E Gooding; Soldano Ferrone; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.968

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.