Literature DB >> 16431898

A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.

Fulya Isik1, Didem Nalbantgil, Korkmaz Sayinsu, Tülin Arun.   

Abstract

The aim of this compound cephalometric and arch-width study was to determine any dental and/or skeletal differences between subjects with Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions. The dento-skeletal characteristics of Class II subjects were evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs and dental casts of 90 untreated patients. The sample included 46 Class II division 1 patients (19 girls and 27 boys) with a mean age of 15.27 +/- 2.48 years, and 44 Class II division 2 patients (27 girls and 17 boys) with a mean age of 15.95 +/- 3.25 years. The intermolar, interpremolar and intercanine measurements were carried out on study models. The radiographs were digitized and processed using Dolphin Imaging software. In addition to standard descriptive statistical calculations, an independent samples t-test was carried out in order to compare the two groups. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was utilized for the parameters for the data which were not normally distributed. The only statistically significant difference between the groups for the study model measurements was mandibular intercanine width. The cephalometric results revealed that SNB angle was responsible for the skeletal sagittal difference between the two groups. In addition, the Class II division 1 group had higher vertical proportions and the Class II division 2 group a more concave profile with a prominent chin. The sagittal skeletal pattern of Class II division 2 subjects was found to be very similar to the Class I skeletal relationship, with no evidence of any mandibular restriction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16431898     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Comparative assessment of various cephalometric facial planes with intercanine width in orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Erum Behroz Khan; Sunia Soomar; Mairah Shah; Samar Fatima; Sohail Khan; Zuhair Ahmed; Sarvaich Kumar
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Craniofacial characteristics of Syrian adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Alaa Al Ayoubi; Daniel Dalla Torre; Melinda Madléna
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Association of dentoskeletal morphology with incisor inclination in angle class II patients: a retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Christian Kirschneck; Piero Römer; Peter Proff; Carsten Lippold
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Pathognomonic features of Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion: A comparative cephalometric and arch width study.

Authors:  Singamsetty E R V Prasad; Ravikishore Reddy Indukuri; Rupesh Singh; Anitha Nooney; Firoz Babu Palagiri; Veera Narayana
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-12

5.  The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis.

Authors:  Olavo Cesar Lyra Porto; Jairo Curado de Freitas; Ana Helena Gonçalves de Alencar; Carlos Estrela
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Diagnostic features of Angle's Class II div 2 malocclusion.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar Dodda; Singamsetty E R V Prasad; Ravi Krishna Kanuru; Siddhartha Nalluri; Radhika Mittapalli
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

7.  Three-dimensional analysis of dental arch forms in Italian population.

Authors:  Bruno Oliva; Simone Sferra; Anna Lucia Greco; Francesco Valente; Cristina Grippaudo
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Correlation between vertical components and skeletal Class II malocclusion in ethnic Javanese.

Authors:  I Gusti Aju Wahju Ardani; Ira Willyanti; Ida B Narmada
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-12-19

9.  Dentoskeletal and tooth-size differences between Syrian and Hungarian adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Alaa Al Ayoubi; Alireza Khandan Dezfully; Melinda Madléna
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-06-03

10.  Correlation between dental arch width and sagittal dento-skeletal morphology in untreated adults.

Authors:  Atefe Saffar Shahroudi; Tahura Etezadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-11-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.