Literature DB >> 16431897

A computerized photographic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrepancy and mandibular outline asymmetry.

Sarah Good1, Raymond Edler, David Wertheim, Darrel Greenhill.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between mandibular outline asymmetry and skeletal discrepancy in a sample of orthodontic patients (33 females, 33 males) aged from 8 to 19 years. Skeletal discrepancy was assessed in both the anteroposterior and vertical planes, using standard cephalometric analyses. All were photographed under standardized conditions and the photographs were then digitized for analysis using a computerized system to assess differences in four variables (area, perimeter, compactness and moment-ratio) between the right and left sides of the mandibular outline. The results showed good repeatability of the photographic, cephalometric and digitization methods. A statistically significant relationship was found between mandibular outline asymmetry and both anteroposterior and vertical skeletal discrepancy in this sample, when compared with patients with an average skeletal pattern. There appeared to be a statistically significant relationship between a reduced ANB angle (< 3 degrees) and mandibular outline asymmetry (P = 0.051), as well as between an increase in lower face height and mandibular asymmetry (P = 0.023).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16431897     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Comparative stability and outcomes of two surgical approaches for correction of class III asymmetry with lip or occlusal cant.

Authors:  Chih-Ling Lin; Ying-An Chen; Chuan-Fong Yao; Chun-Shin Chang; Yu-Fang Liao; Yu-Ray Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Christian Reis Lemes; Carolina Fernandes Tozzi; Saulo Gribel; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Giovana Cherubini Venezian; Caroline do Carmo Menezes; William Custodio
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  Guilherme Thiesen; Bruno F Gribel; Maria Perpétua M Freitas; Donald R Oliver; Ki Beom Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 4.  Facial asymmetry revisited: Part I- diagnosis and treatment planning.

Authors:  Dhirendra Srivastava; Harpreet Singh; Sonal Mishra; Poonam Sharma; Pranav Kapoor; Lokesh Chandra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05-15

Review 5.  Facial asymmetry: a current review.

Authors:  Guilherme Thiesen; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

6.  Prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in different skeletal sagittal patterns.

Authors:  Karine Evangelista; Ana Beatriz Teodoro; Jonas Bianchi; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Maria Alves Garcia Silva; José Valladares-Neto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Vertical growth pattern as a determinant of mandibular asymmetry.

Authors:  Maria Habib; Tabassum Ahsan; Omair Majeed; Faisal Faheem
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.340

8.  Three-dimensional investigation of facial surface asymmetries in skeletal malocclusion patients before and after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  M Blockhaus; J Kochel; J Hartmann; A Stellzig-Eisenhauer; P Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Asymmetry assessment using cone beam CT. A Class I and Class II patient comparison.

Authors:  Matthew M Sievers; Brent E Larson; Philippe R Gaillard; Andrew Wey
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.

Authors:  Muge Aksu; Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.