Literature DB >> 1643065

Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality.

M A Hardin1, D R Van Demark, H L Morris, M M Payne.   

Abstract

The relationship between nasalance scores and perceptual judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality was examined for 74 subjects (51 with cleft palate and 23 noncleft controls). Twenty-nine of the 51 subjects with cleft palate had received pharyngeal flap surgery. Predictive analyses were performed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of the Nasometer as a screening instrument. The overall relationship between perceptual judgments of hypernasality and nasalance scores was good for the nonflap subjects when a nasalance cutoff score of 26 was used. A sensitivity coefficient of 0.87 and a specificity coefficient of 0.93 were obtained. Ninety-one percent of the nasometry-based classifications accurately reflected listener judgments of hypernasality. The correspondence between nasalance scores and clinical judgments of hyponasality was also good for the nonflap subjects when a nasalance cutoff score of 50 was used. Ninety-one percent of these classifications were consistent with the listener judgments. Efficiency of nasometry was poorer for the flap subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1643065     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0346_cbnsal_2.3.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  10 in total

1.  [Hyperrhinophonia and craniofacial structure. A cephalometric analysis].

Authors:  A Stellzig; G Komposch
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1994-08

2.  [The nasometer. An instrument for the objective study of hyperrhinophonia in cheilognathopalatoschisis patients].

Authors:  A Stellzig; W Heppt; G Komposch
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1994-08

3.  A protocol for comprehensive assessment of bulbar dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Authors:  Yana Yunusova; Jordan R Green; Jun Wang; Gary Pattee; Lorne Zinman
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  The relation of nasality and nasalance to nasal port area based on a computational model.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Brad H Story
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-10-04

5.  Objective Assessment of Hypernasality in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate with the NasalView System: A Clinical Validation Study.

Authors:  Kai Wermker; Susanne Jung; Ulrich Joos; Johannes Kleinheinz
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-12

6.  Characteristics of nasal resonance and perceptual rating in prelingual hearing impaired adults.

Authors:  Eun Yeon Kim; Mi Sun Yoon; Hyang Hee Kim; Chung Mo Nam; Eun Sook Park; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Hypernasality associated with basal ganglia dysfunction: evidence from Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Michal Novotný; Jan Rusz; Roman Čmejla; Hana Růžičková; Jiří Klempíř; Evžen Růžička
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The Impact of Nasalance on Cepstral Peak Prominence and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio.

Authors:  Catherine Madill; Duong Duy Nguyen; Kristie Yick-Ning Cham; Daniel Novakovic; Patricia McCabe
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Velo-pharyngeal dysfunction: Evaluation and management.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Marsh
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10

10.  Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Fabiane Rodrigues Larangeira; Jeniffer de Cássia Rillo Dutka; Melina Evangelista Whitaker; Olívia Mesquita Vieira de Souza; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Mariana Jales Felix da Silva; Maria Inês Pegoraro-Krook
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.