Literature DB >> 16430625

Site of local anaesthesia in transrectal ultrasonography-guided 12-core prostate biopsy: does it make a difference?

Joe Philip1, John E McCabe, Subhajit Dutta Roy, Azizan Samsudin, Iain M Campbell, Pradip Javlé.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the efficacy of bi-basal vs bi-apical periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) during 12-core prostate biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), and to evaluate the pain experienced on inserting the probe compared to the biopsy procedure, as PPNB with lignocaine local anaesthesia has been used for over a decade for minimizing pain during prostatic biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 143 men who were to have a TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were systematically randomized to two groups, to receive PPNB at the apex or base. A 10-cm visual analogue score was used to record the pain experienced during probe insertion, the biopsy and just before to leaving the department .
RESULTS: The mean pain score on biopsy in the apical group was similar to that of the basal group (apex 1.9, base 1.6, P = 0.36). Probe introduction produced a significantly higher pain score (probe 2.2, biopsy 1.7, P < 0.001) than at the biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who experienced greater pain with the introduction of the probe also reported more pain with the biopsy procedure. The site of local anaesthetic before prostatic biopsy showed no significant difference in pain scores. Older men tolerated the procedure better. Analgesia after PPNB at near either the apex or base appears equal, regardless of the site of injection. We suggest that topical perianal anaesthetic agents could significantly reduce not only pain perception, but also improve tolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16430625     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05957.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of three different analgesic methods for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  X Ouzounidis; K Moysidis; N Kalinderis; D Papanikolaou; P Koukourikis; E Papaefstathiou; K Hatzimouratidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Intrarectal ice application prior to transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial accessing pain and collateral effects.

Authors:  Baris Caliskan; Nazim Mutlu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Lateral decubitus position vs. lithotomy position: which is the best way to minimize patient's pain perception during transrectal prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Phil Hyun Song; Young Hwii Ko
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Efficacy and safety of a combined anesthetic technique for transrectal prostate biopsy: a single center, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  João Pimentel Torres; Adriana Rodrigues; Nuno Morais; Sara Anacleto; Ricardo Matos Rodrigues; Paulo Mota; Ricardo Leão; Estêvão Lima
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-09-16

5.  Does music from noise-canceling headphones have a beneficial effect on men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Byung Chan Lee; Hyoung Ook Kim; Ho Seok Chung; Suk Hee Heo; Yong Yeon Jeong; Myung Soo Kim; Eu Chang Hwang; Seung Il Jung; Dongdeuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-02-20

6.  Identifying the variables associated with pain during transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate.

Authors:  Chen-Pang Hou; Yu-Hsiang Lin; Meng-Chiao Hsieh; Chien-Lun Chen; Phei-Lang Chang; Ying-Chen Huang; Ke-Hung Tsui
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 7.  Pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and the role of periprostatic nerve block: what radiologists should know.

Authors:  Babar Nazir
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.