Literature DB >> 16430308

Prediction of cytochrome p450-mediated hepatic drug clearance in neonates, infants and children : how accurate are available scaling methods?

Sven Björkman1.   

Abstract

Correct dosing of drugs in neonates, infants and children is hampered by a general lack of knowledge about drug disposition in this population. Suggested methods to improve our knowledge without performing conventional full-scale investigations include population pharmacokinetic studies, allometric scaling of drug disposition according to bodyweight and in silico prediction of pharmacokinetics. The last method entails scaling of pharmacokinetic parameters according to age-dependent changes in drug absorption and elimination capacity, plasma protein binding and physiological characteristics of the subjects. Maturation (or ontogeny) of the drug-metabolising part of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system is thus an important factor in the calculations for most drugs. The aim of this commentary is to test and critically examine the proposed methods to estimate hepatic clearance (CL) as a function of age (0-20 years), with CYP3A-mediated metabolism as the case in point. Midazolam and alfentanil were used as model drugs. Allometric scaling failed to predict the CL of midazolam and alfentanil in neonates. Calculations using in vitro findings on CYP maturation gave better estimates for neonates but very divergent ones for older infants and children. This was chiefly due to very different data on CYP3A4/5 ontogeny in three published studies. In the age range where full adult CYP activity per gram of liver could be assumed, allometric scaling and in silico predictions gave similar results. These predictions were also in approximate agreement with clinical data.The findings with the two model drugs can very probably be generalised to most drugs cleared by CYP-dependent hepatic metabolism. Allometric scaling accounts for development of body size and function but not for the fact that the drug-metabolising capacity of the liver is generally low at birth. The crucial question in the prediction of CL is thus when the activity of the applicable CYP isoform(s) attains adult levels. There are still not enough data on this, particularly when different studies even on the same CYP isoform have given very divergent results. It may also be pointed out that CYP ontogeny is an area where we have at least some information. There are several other important developmental changes about which we know practically nothing. Thus, while allometric scaling is generally unreliable for prediction in neonates and infants, the alternative method of in silico prediction can at present be used only to obtain tentative initial estimates of drug CL. Neither of the methods can be used as a substitute for actual clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16430308     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200645010-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  62 in total

Review 1.  Dose estimation for children.

Authors:  Nigel Baber; Deborah Pritchard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Drug metabolism and disposition in children.

Authors:  M Strolin Benedetti; E L Baltes
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.748

3.  Expression of CYP2D6 in developing human liver.

Authors:  J M Treluyer; E Jacqz-Aigrain; F Alvarez; T Cresteil
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1991-12-05

4.  A pilot evaluation of alfentanil-induced miosis as a noninvasive probe for hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) activity in humans.

Authors:  S Phimmasone; E D Kharasch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of alfentanil: the average dose-plasma concentration relationship and interindividual variability in patients.

Authors:  P O Maitre; S Vozeh; J Heykants; D A Thomson; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  How important are gender differences in pharmacokinetics?

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm; Ingrid Beierle; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Expression of CYP3A in the human liver--evidence that the shift between CYP3A7 and CYP3A4 occurs immediately after birth.

Authors:  D Lacroix; M Sonnier; A Moncion; G Cheron; T Cresteil
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1997-07-15

8.  Population pharmacokinetics and metabolism of midazolam in pediatric intensive care patients.

Authors:  S N de Wildt; M de Hoog; A A Vinks; E van der Giesen; J N van den Anker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  The disposition of alfentanil in neonates with respiratory distress.

Authors:  D B Wiest; B L Ohning; S S Garner
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 10.  Incorporating pharmacokinetic differences between children and adults in assessing children's risks to environmental toxicants.

Authors:  Gary Ginsberg; Dale Hattis; Babasaheb Sonawane
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.219

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics in neonatal prescribing: evidence base, paradigms and the future.

Authors:  Kate O'Hara; Ian M R Wright; Jennifer J Schneider; Alison L Jones; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  A bodyweight-dependent allometric exponent for scaling clearance across the human life-span.

Authors:  Chenguang Wang; Mariska Y M Peeters; Karel Allegaert; Heleen J Blussé van Oud-Alblas; Elke H J Krekels; Dick Tibboel; Meindert Danhof; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Effect of CYP3A and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of calcineurin inhibitors: Part I.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Lucy K Goodman; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacokinetic properties of conventional and double-dose sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine given as intermittent preventive treatment in infancy.

Authors:  Sam Salman; Susan Griffin; Kay Kose; Nolene Pitus; Josephine Winmai; Brioni Moore; Peter Siba; Kenneth F Ilett; Ivo Mueller; Timothy M E Davis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  To scale or not to scale: the principles of dose extrapolation.

Authors:  Vijay Sharma; John H McNeill
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Pharmacokinetic design optimization in children and estimation of maturation parameters: example of cytochrome P450 3A4.

Authors:  Marion Bouillon-Pichault; Vincent Jullien; Caroline Bazzoli; Gérard Pons; Michel Tod
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Consequences of Phenytoin Exposure on Hepatic Cytochrome P450 Expression during Postnatal Liver Maturation in Mice.

Authors:  Stephanie C Piekos; Liming Chen; Pengcheng Wang; Jian Shi; Sharon Yaqoob; Hao-Jie Zhu; Xiaochao Ma; Xiao-Bo Zhong
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  A predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of fentanyl for analgesia/sedation in neonates based on a semi-physiologic approach.

Authors:  Esther Encinas; Rosario Calvo; John C Lukas; Valvanera Vozmediano; Monica Rodriguez; Elena Suarez
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Population Pharmacokinetics: Some Observations in Pediatric Modeling for Drug Clearance.

Authors:  Iftekhar Mahmood; Million A Tegenge
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Population pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine active metabolite in Chinese paediatric epilepsy patients and its application in individualised dosage regimens.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Lin; Xi-Wen Li; Zheng Jiao; Jin Zhang; Xin Rao; Da-Yong Zeng; Xin-Hua Lin; Chang-Lian Wang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.